Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 26;25(15):3245–3254. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw174

Table 3.

Imputation accuracy comparison by genetic analysis group and region from empirical masking.

Region/ group Number of samples Imputation setting 1: Phase 1, khap=max mean (SD) Imputation setting 2: Phase 3, khap=half max mean (SD) Imputation setting 3: Phase 3, khap=max mean (SD)
Mainland 772 0.99005 (0.00197) 0.99056 (0.00184) 0.99066 (0.00174)
 Central American 184 0.98995 (0.00173) 0.99047 (0.00165) 0.99063 (0.00154)
 Mexican 475 0.99011 (0.00203) 0.99057 (0.00186) 0.99067 (0.00176)
 South American 113 0.98994 (0.00207) 0.99066 (0.00205) 0.9907 (0.00192)
Caribbean 616 0.98822 (0.00182) 0.98967 (0.00196) 0.98986 (0.00192)
 Cuban 253 0.98754 (0.00144) 0.98875 (0.00171) 0.98892 (0.00166)
 Dominican 132 0.98736 (0.00171) 0.98889 (0.00159) 0.98913 (0.00151)
 Puerto Rican 231 0.98946 (0.00156) 0.99111 (0.00150) 0.99131 (0.00147)

Summaries of by-sample dosage r2 metrics from the empirical masking of supplemental array variants on chromosome 22. Mean dosage r2 values and SD are given for samples grouped both by region (Caribbean and Mainland) and by genetic analysis group. These summaries are restricted to the set of mutually unrelated samples from supplemental array genotyping with non-missing genetic analysis group (n = 1388).