Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 3;40(1):46–53. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0810

Table 2.

ORs (95% CI) for type 1 and type 2 diabetes and interquartile range increase (i.e., participants in the 75th vs. 25th percentiles) in measures of arsenic species in plasma

75th vs. 25th percentile* Type 1 diabetes
Type 2 diabetes
Model 1 OR (95% CI) Model 2 OR (95% CI) Model 3 OR (95% CI) Model 1 OR (95% CI) Model 2 OR (95% CI) Model 3 OR (95% CI)
Concentrations of arsenic species
 ∑As (ng/L) 110.3 vs. 63.8 0.89 (0.72, 1.11) 0.90 (0.71, 1.13) 0.88 (0.69, 1.12) 0.93 (0.68, 1.27) 1.04 (0.66, 1.64) 1.03 (0.66, 1.62)
 iAs (ng/L) 63.1 vs. 40.7 0.87 (0.75, 1.01) 0.85 (0.73, 1.00) 0.84 (0.71, 0.99) 0.84 (0.67, 1.06) 0.94 (0.69, 1.28) 0.93 (0.69, 1.27)
 MMA (ng/L) 13.9 vs. 4.2 1.21 (0.94, 1.54) 1.21 (0.93, 1.57) 1.22 (0.93, 1.60) 1.23 (0.87, 1.75) 1.06 (0.63, 1.77) 1.03 (0.62, 1.73)
 DMA (ng/L) 30.1 vs. 13 1.14 (0.93, 1.39) 1.15 (0.94, 1.42) 1.15 (0.92, 1.43) 1.17 (0.88, 1.55) 1.14 (0.74, 1.75) 1.13 (0.73, 1.73)
Arsenic metabolism biomarkers
 iAs% 74 vs. 51.2 0.74 (0.57, 0.96) 0.70 (0.53, 0.92) 0.68 (0.50, 0.91) 0.68 (0.47, 0.98) 0.81 (0.48, 1.36) 0.82 (0.48, 1.39)
 MMA% 14.9 vs. 6.3 1.27 (1.00, 1.60) 1.29 (1.01, 1.65) 1.33 (1.02, 1.74) 1.42 (1.01, 2.00) 1.11 (0.67, 1.85) 1.09 (0.65, 1.82)
 DMA% 33.5 vs. 18.6 1.21 (0.97, 1.49) 1.27 (1.01, 1.58) 1.28 (1.01, 1.63) 1.25 (0.94, 1.66) 1.17 (0.78, 1.76) 1.17 (0.77, 1.77)

Model 1 is unadjusted; model 2 adjusted for age at visit (years), sex, BMI, parental educational level, and race; model 3 further adjusted for total folate and vitamin B12 levels.

*75th and 25th percentiles of each arsenic variable distribution were among control participants.