Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 21;4:e2778. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2778

Table 1. Overview of datasets on the differences in insect diversity between native and non-native plants using the community (1–22) or the biogeographical approach (23–33).

Indicated are for each dataset the plant sample size (number of native/non-native plant species), the mean difference in insect diversity (number of species), and the standardized mean difference in insect diversity (±95% confidence interval). Overall outcome of random effects (RE) model indicated in italics. Significant differences are indicated in bold.

Dataset and reference Sample size (native/non-native plants) Mean difference insect diversity (native–non-native) Standardized mean diff. insect diversity (±95% CI)
Community approach
1 Agrawal et al. (2005) 14/14 0.11 0.08 [−0.66, 0.82]
2 Auerbach & Simberloff (1988) 1/2 4.00
3 Bürki & Nentwig (1997) 1/1 0.00
4 Engelkes et al. (2012) 2/2 36.60 0.68 [−1.33, 2.70]
5 Goßner, Gruppe & Simon (2005) 1/1 −5.00
6 Goßner, Liston & Späth (2007) 4/2 0.07 0.48 [−1.24, 2.20]
7 Hartley, Rogers & Siemann (2010) 3/1 6.61
8 Harvey et al. (2015) 5/5 0.01 0.05 [−1.19 , 1.29]
9 Helden, Stamp & Leather (2012) 16/7 1.39 0.51 [−0.39, 1.41]
10 Jobin, Schaffner & Nentwig (1996) 1/1 33.00
11 Kennedy & Southwood (1984) 21/7 12.62 1.08 [0.18, 1.99]
12 Leather (1986) 46/13 14.11 0.44 [−0.19, 1.06]
13 Liu & Stiling (2006) 2/4 4.00 1.38 [−0.49, 3.24]
14 Meijer et al. (2015) 8/20 0.31 0.79 [−0.06 , 1.63]
15 Meijer et al. (2015) 19/19 0.40 0.50 [−0.15 , 1.14]
16 Novotny et al. (2003) 1/2 −0.82
17 Proches et al. (2008) 3/9 2.26 1.02 [−0.35, 2.38]
18 Radho-Toly, Majer & Yates (2001) 2/2 0.80 1.77 [−0.54, 4.08]
19 Southwood, Moran & Kennedy (1982) 4/2 44.75 2.30 [0.16, 4.44]
20 Southwood, Moran & Kennedy (1982) 3/3 14.00 1.33 [−0.44, 3.10]
21 Southwood et al. (2004) 2/2 130.5 1.46 [−0.75, 3.67]
22 Sugiura (2010) 102/49 0.45 0.77 [0.42, 1.13]
RE model 261/168 0.67 [0.46 , 0.89]
Biogeographical approach
23 Cripps et al. (2006) 1 33.0
24 Goeden (1974) 1 18.0
25 Meijer et al. (2015) 2 0.96 0.66 [−1.35 , 2.68]
26 Meijer et al. (2015) 12 0.31 0.31 [−0.49 , 1.12]
27 Memmott et al. (2000) 2 11.0 3.10 [0.19, 6.01]
28 Moore (1975) 1 2.0
29 Southwood, Moran & Kennedy (1982) 2 51.5 4.64 [0.87, 8.40]
30 Southwood et al. (2004) 1 8.0
31 Szentesi (1999) 1 9.0
32 Wilson & Flanagan (1990) 1 42.0
33 Wilson, Flanagan & Gillett (1990) 1 19.0
RE model 25 1.59 [−0.19–3.37]