Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 21;4:e2778. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2778

Table 3. Overview of datasets on the differences in level of herbivory between native and non-native insects, using the community (52–64) or the biogeographical approach (65–68).

Indicated are for each dataset the plant sample size (number of native/non-native plant species), the mean difference in insect diversity (number of species), and the standardized mean difference in insect diversity (± 95% confidence interval). Overall outcome of random effects (RE) model indicated in italics. Significant differences are indicated in bold.

Dataset and reference Sample size (native/non-native plants) Mean difference in herbivore level (native–non-native) Standardized mean diff. (± 95% CI)
Community approach
52 Agrawal & Kotanen (2003) 15/15 −1.66 −0.17 [−0.89, 0.54]
53 Carpenter & Cappuccino (2005) 30/39 1.20 0.61 [0.12, 1.10]
54 Cincotta, Adams & Holzapfel (2008) 1/1 −1.16
55 Harvey et al. (2015) 5/5 0.08 1.11 [−0.22 , 2.45]
56 Heard & Sax (2013) 6/6 −17.23 −2.31 [−3.77, −0.85
57 Hill & Kotanen (2010) 20/15 0.62 0.77 [0.09, 1.47]
58 Lieurance & Cipollini (2013) 1/1 19.73
59 Liu, Stiling & Pemberton (2007) 2/1 0.06
60 Liu, Stiling & Pemberton (2007) 2/4 0.14 10.28 [4.22, 16.34]
61 Lombardero, Vázquez-Mejuto & Ayres (2008) 1/1 12.60
62 Meijer et al. (2015) 6/11 6.55 0.6 [−0.41, 1.62]
63 Meijer et al. (2015) 12/4 2.47 0.61 [−0.54, 1.76]
64 Schutzenhofer, Valone & Knight (2009) 1/1 9.08
RE model 102/104 0.91 [−1.89, 3.70]
Biogeographical approach
65 Adams et al. (2008) 1 5.02
66 Cripps et al. (2010) 1 25.80
67 Vilà, Maron & Marco (2005) 1 19.79
68 Wolfe (2002) 1 24.00