Table 4.
Task name | Brief description | Key variables | References |
---|---|---|---|
Emotion expression recognition | View face and label emotion expressed (happy, sad, anger, fear, disgust, surprise) where faces are morphs along axes between emotional expressions. | Acc, RT for each emotion | Calder et al., 1996, Ekman and Friesen, 1976 |
Emotional memory | Study: View (positive, neutral, or negative) background image, then object image superimposed, and imagine a ‘story’ linking the two; Test (incidental): View and identify degraded image of (studied, new) object, then judge memory and confidence for visually intact image of same object, then recall valence and any details of background image from study phase. | For each valence: Priming (Acc for studied vs. new degraded objects); familiarity (Acc for item memory); recollection (Acc for background memory) | Mitchell, 1989, Fleischman, 2007, La Voie and Light, 1994, Lang et al., 1988 |
Emotional reactivity and regulation | View (positive, neutral, negative) film clips under instructions to simply ‘watch’ or ‘reappraise’ (attempt to reduce emotional impact by reinterpreting its meaning; for some negative films only), then rate emotional impact (how negative, positive they felt during clip) and the degree to which they successfully reappraised. | Reactivity (ratings for ‘watch’ trials: positive vs. neutral; negative vs. neutral); regulation (ratings for ‘reappraise’ negative vs. ‘watch’ negative) | Dalgleish, 2004, Mather, 2012, Mather and Carstensen, 2005 |
Face recognition: familiar faces | View faces of famous people (and some unknown foils), judge whether each is familiar, and if so, what is known about the person (occupation, nationality, origin of fame, etc.), then attempt to provide person's name. | Acc (identifying information or full name given) as a proportion of number of faces recognised as familiar, subtracting false alarms (unknown faces given ‘familiar’ response) | Germine and Hooker, 2011, Bartlett and Leslie, 1986 |
Face recognition: unfamiliar faces | Given a target image of a face, identify same individual in an array of 6 face images (with possible changes in head orientation and lighting between target and same face in the test array) | Acc | Benton et al., 1983, Levin et al., 1975 |
Fluid intelligence | Complete nonverbal puzzles involving series completion, classification, matrices, and conditions. | Acc on each of 4 subtests | Cattell, 1971; Testing IfPaA, 1973, Kievit et al., 2014 |
Force matching | Match mechanical force applied to left index finger by using right index finger either directly, pressing a lever which transmits force to left index finger, or indirectly, by moving a slider which adjusts the force transmitted to the left index finger. | Average difference between target force and matched force applied by participant via (direct, indirect) means | |
Hotel task | Perform tasks in role of hotel manager: write customer bills, sort money, proofread advert, sort playing cards, alphabetise list of names. Total time must be allocated equally between tasks; there is not enough time to complete any one task. | Number of tasks attempted, deviation from optimal time allocation | Shallice and Burgess, 1991, Kievit et al., 2014 |
Motor learning | Time-pressured movement of a cursor to a target by moving an (occluded) stylus under veridical, perturbed (30°), and reset (veridical again) mappings between visual and real space. | RT (movement time to hit target), trajectory error (angle) across phases | |
Picture-picture priming | Name the pictured object presented alone (baseline), then when preceded by a prime object that is phonologically related (one, two initial phonemes), semantically related (low, high relatedness), or unrelated. | Acc, RT, priming effects (RT of each condition vs. baseline) | |
Proverb comprehension | Read and interpret three English proverbs. | Sum of response ratings (1 = incorrect or “don't know”, 2 = partly correct but literal, 3 = correct and abstract) | Hodges, 1994 |
Sentence comprehension | Listen to and judge grammatical acceptability of partial sentences, beginning with an (ambiguous, unambiguous) sentence stem (e.g., “Tom noticed that landing planes…”) followed by a disambiguating continuation word (e.g., “are”) in a different voice. Ambiguity is either semantic or syntactic, with empirically determined dominant and subordinate interpretations. | RT, proportion of “unacceptable” responses in each condition | Rodd et al., 2010, Tyler et al., 2011 |
Tip-of-the-tongue task | View faces of famous people (actors, musicians, politicians, etc.) and respond with the person's name, or “don't know” if they do not know the person's name (even if familiar), or “TOT” if they know the person's name but are (temporarily) unable to retrieve it. | Proportion of responses of each type; incorrect “Know” responses; partial information responses (e.g., occupation) | Lovelace and Twohig, 1990, Reese et al., 1999 |
Visual short-term memory | View (1–4) coloured discs briefly presented on a computer screen, then after a delay, attempt to remember the colour of the disc that was at a cued location, with response indicated by selecting the colour on a colour wheel (touchscreen input). | Parameters of model fitted to error distribution: VSTM capacity (k), precision, probability of reporting an un-cued item | Zhang and Luck, 2008 |
Notes. Acc = accuracy; RT = response times.