Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Oct 24;23(1):60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.10.010

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients with WM/LPL who underwent alloHCT reported to the CIBMTR

Variable All1 MAC RIC p-value (MAC vs. RIC)
Number of Patients 1442 67 67
Number of Centers 84 39 45
Age at Transplant, years 0.02
    Median Age 53 (21-76) 50 (21-66) 53(34-76) 0.008
    21-49 55 (38) 34 (51) 18 (27)
    50-59 63 (44) 23 (34) 35 (52)
    ≥ 60 26 (18) 10 (15) 14 (21)
Gender: Male 98 (68) 44 (66) 46(69) 0.71
Karnofsky score: <80% 15 (10) 6 (9) 7 (10) 0.74
Region
    US 109 (76) 50 (75) 50 (75) 0.006
    Canada 22 (15) 15 (22) 6 (9)
    Other2 13 (9) 2 (2) 11 (16)
Graft Type
    Bone Marrow 14 (10) 12 (18) 1 (1) 0.001
    Peripheral Blood 130 (90) 55 (82) 66 (99)
Donor Type 0.97
    HLA-identical sibling 75 (52) 36 (54) 37(54)
    HLA-matched relative 7 (5) 3 (4) 3 (4)
    HLA-matched non-relative 57 (40) 2 (3) 2 (3)
    HLA-mismatched relative 5 (3) 26 (39) 25 (37)

Transplant-related
Year of Transplant 0.60
    2001-2005 61 (42) 27 (40) 30 (45)
    2006-2013 83 (58) 40 (60) 37 (55)
Time from diagnosis to transplant 0.66
    Median months (range) 41 (<1-204) 38 (<1-204) 47 (<1-198) 0.34
    <24 months 52 (36) 26 (39) 21 (31)
    24-60 months 43 (30) 20 (30) 22 (33)
    >60 months 49 (34) 21 (31) 24 (36)
Disease Status prior to AlloHCT 0.58
    Complete Response/CRu3 20 (14) 11 (16) 8 (12)
    Partial Response 62 (43) 28 (42) 33 (49)
    Stable Disease 7 (5) 2 (3) 5 (8)
    Progression/Relapse 32 (22) 16 (24) 15 (22)
    Never Treated 1 (11) 1 (1) 0
    Unknown 22 (15) 9 (13) 6 (9)
Sensitivity to Chemotherapy 0.56
    Sensitive 82 (57) 39 (58) 41 (61)
    Resistant 39 (27) 18 (27) 20 (30)
    Unknown 23 (16) 10 (15) 6 (9)
Prior AutoHCT 18 (13) 6 (9) 6 (9) 1
Conditioning Regimen Intensity4
    Myeloablative 67 (47) 67 (100) 0
    Reduced Intensity 67 (47) 0 67 (100)
    Unknown 10 (7) NA NA
Anti-thymocyte Globulin 0.27
    No 119 (81) 57 (85) 52 (78)
    Yes 25 (19) 10 (15) 15 (22)
GVHD prophylaxis <0.001
    Cyclosporin-based 37 (26) 5 (8) 28 (42)
    Methotrexate + Cyclosporin 29 (20) 20 (30) 8 (12)
    Tacrolimus-based 72 (50) 37 (55) 30 (45)
    Unknown 6 (4) 5 (8) 1 (1)
Medium Follow-up from Allo-HCT, months (range) 70 (4-144) 97 (4-143) 35 (12-144) 0.56

Disease-related (research form only)
Number of Patients 36 18 18
Prior Lines of Chemotherapy
    1-3 20 (56) 8 (44) 12 (67)
    >3 16 (44) 10 (56) 6 (33)
Pre-alloHCT chemotherapy5
    Cladribine/Fludurabine (+/− Chlorambucil) 15 (42) 8 (44) 7 (39)
    Adriamycin-based 14 (39) 7 (39) 7 (39)
    Bortezomib-based 3 (8) 1 (6) 2 (11)
    Others3 4 (11) 2 (11) 2 (11)
Pre-alloHCT Rituximab 21 (58) 12 (67) 9 (50)
1

Data is displayed as the number of patient with the percent of patients shown in parentheses, unless otherwise noted.

2

Includes patients with unknown conditioning (n=10).

3

Central/South America (n=4), Australia/New Zealand (n=3), Asian (n=3), Mideast/Africa (3).

4

Unconfirmed complete response (CRu), not applicable (NA), not done (ND)

5

Conditioning regimens: Cytarabine (Cy) + Total body irradiation (TBI) (n=21), Fludarabine (Flu) + TBI (n=23), TBI + others (n=12), Busulfan (Bu) + Cy (n=10), Flu + Cy +/− TBI (n=19), Flu + Melphalan (Mel) (n=16), Flu + Bu (n=22), Mel (n=9), Carmustine, Etoposide, Cy, MEL (BEAM) (n=4), Total lymphoid irradiation + anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (n=5), Cy (n=1), ATG + Cy + Pentostatin (n=1), Bu + Rituximab + Pentostatin (n=1)

6. Other chemotherapies: Etoposide, Alemtuzumab, Imatinib, Procarabazine