Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2016 Oct 1;144(Pt A):183–202. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.070

Table 4.

Comparisons of the accuracy of ASHS automatic segmentations and the warped segmentations of the single-template, variant-template and unified-template approaches. Accuracy is measured by the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) between each label of the warped template segmentation and that of the manual segmentation. Each label's mean DSC and its standard deviation (in parenthesis) at each hemisphere are reported in the table.

Label Single Template
vs. Manual		 Variant Template
vs. Manual		 Unified Template
vs. Manual		 ASHS vs. Manual
Left Hemisphere
  ERC 0.7800 (0.0493)** 0.7802 (0.0492)** 0.7799 (0.0483) 0.7785 (0.0491)
  BA35 0.6847 (0.0837) 0.6870 (0.0819) 0.6878 (0.0777)* 0.6843 (0.0809)
  BA36 0.7613 (0.0540)** 0.7679 (0.0563) 0.7670 (0.0556) 0.7683 (0.0558)
  PHC 0.7689 (0.0510)* 0.7692 (0.0507)** 0.7689 (0.0511)** 0.7665 (0.0516)
  CS 0.5639 (0.0918)** 0.5826 (0.0991)** 0.5795 (0.0939)** 0.6040 (0.0970)
Right Hemisphere
  ERC 0.7606 (0.0662)* 0.7608 (0.0659)** 0.7603 (0.0660)* 0.7591 (0.0652)
  BA35 0.6733 (0.0742)** 0.6772 (0.0760) 0.6742 (0.0744)* 0.6777 (0.0752)
  BA36 0.7596 (0.0611)* 0.7617 (0.0612) 0.7615 (0.0607) 0.7618 (0.0604)
  PHC 0.7785 (0.0458) 0.7786 (0.0456) 0.7784 (0.0457) 0.7783 (0.0457)
  CS 0.5915 (0.0704)** 0.6125 (0.0748)** 0.6007 (0.0704)** 0.6339 (0.0785)

Note:

*

: p < 0.05;

**

: p < 0.01.

Red/blue stars denote significant increase/decrease of performance compared with the DSC of ASHS automatic segmentations vs. manual segmentations, tested by two-tailed paired t-tests.