Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 26;7:2011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02011

Table 2.

Goodness-of-fit indices for the own model of the SRAS-R-C depending on gender.

χ2 S–Bχ2 df TLI R-CFI R-RMSEA SRMR ΔS–Bχ2df, p) ΔCFI
Boys 348.54 256.65 129 0.901 0.915 0.042 [0.035–0.050] 0.051
Girls 301.28 217.77 129 0.920 0.934 0.036 [0.028–0.044] 0.052
Model 0 649.82 474.06 258 0.910 0.924 0.028 [0.024–0.032] 0.052
Model 1 667.53 482.23 272 0.918 0.926 0.027 [0.023–0.031] 0.054 10.84 (14, 0.698) 0.002
Model 2 684.90 500.99 290 0.913 0.925 0.027 [0.023–0.030] 0.054 15.69 (18, 0.614) -0.001
Model 3 717.86 505.91 308 0.917 0.928 0.025 [0.022–0.029] 0.055 14.63 (18, 0.687) 0.003
Model 4 697.23 507.02 300 0.918 0.927 0.026 [0.022–0.030] 0.057 7.66 (10, 0.662) 0.002

Model 0 = Free model; Model 1 = Model 0 with factor loadings; Model 2 = Model 1 with intercepts; Model 3 = Model 2 with error variances; Model 4 = Model 2 with variances and covariance factors; S–Bχ2 = Satorra–Bentler χ2 scaled; df, degrees of freedom; TLI, Tucker-Lewis Index; R-CFI, Robust Comparative Fit Index; R-RMSEA, Robust Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual; ΔCFI, comparative fit index difference test. ΔS–Bχ2 = χ2 difference model comparison test; Δdf, difference between degrees of freedom.