Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 26;10:238. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00238

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Average response bias during an early (session 1–8), middle (session 9–16) and late block (session 17–24) of Pavlovian autoshaping training. Response bias was calculated for each session by subtracting CS-elicited port entries from lever-CS activations and dividing by the sum of CS-elicited port entries and lever-CS activations, and then averaging across eight sessions. Individual rats were categorized based on the late block as either sign-trackers (n = 19), intermediates (n = 16) and goal-trackers (n = 28). Shifted sign-trackers (n = 13) were identified as having response bias scores comparable to sign-trackers in the late block and comparable to goal-trackers in the early or middle block. Dashed lines indicate response bias score cut-offs (0.35 and −0.35) for phenotype categorization.