Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 1;2(1):37–43. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2010.13721

Table 2.

Comparison of total dose for OARs with other findings

Mean ± StDev5 (Gyα/β= 3)
NCIS6 Koom et al. [10] Kirisits et al. [11]
Bladder
ICRU Point 67 ± 7 75 ± 19 75 ± 16
ICRU 1.57 84 ± 19 100 ± 25
ICRU 2.0 94 ± 29 112 ± 34
D0.1cc8 104 ± 29 107 ± 30 121 ± 25
D1cc 85 ± 18 90 ± 18 92 ± 11
D2cc 79 ± 15 84 ± 15 83 ± 9
Rectum
ICRU Point 72 ± 6 69 ± 10 69 ± 13
D0.1cc 95 ± 0 80 ± 14 77 ± 10
D1cc 80 ± 7 71 ± 10 66 ± 7
D2cc 74 ± 6 67 ± 9 64 ± 6
Sigmoid
D0.1cc 102 ± 22 82 ± 20 79 ± 12
D1cc 82 ± 12 71 ± 13 67 ± 8
D2cc 76 ± 10 67 ± 11 63 ± 7
5

StDev – Standard deviation

6

NCIS – National University Cancer Institute, Singapore

7

ICRU 1.5, ICRU 2.0 – Points defined 1.5cm and 2.0cm respectively, cranially from the ICRU point

8

D0.1cc, D1cc - Minimum dose to the most irradiated contiguous volume of 0.1cc and 1cc respectively