Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 26;8(12):735–745. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i12.735

Table 7.

Summary of studies comparing the rate of permanent pacemaker between the S3 and XT device

PPM S3 XT P value Predictor/comments
Binder et al[40] 2015 Circulation interventions 17% 13% 0.01 Predictors: Depth, RBBB
Binder et al[14] 2013 JACC interventions 13.30% Excluded patient with LBBB, PR > 200 ms No predictors studied
Husser et al[25] 2015 JACC interventions 15.20% Predictors not studied
Binder et al[40] 2015 EuroIntervention 20.70% Predictor > 8 mm depth of implants
Nijhoff et al[17] 2015 Circulation interventions 9.80% 8.80% 0.94 High implants: 80/20 in aorta as mentioned by authors