Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 15;14(4):836. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.04.836

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the participants

Item* Rural (n=297) Urban (n=305) Total (n=602) p-value (chi-square)
Gender (missing = 0) 297 (50.66%) 305 (49.34%) 602 (100%) 0.1235
Female 196 (65.99%) 219 (71.80%) 415 (68.94%)
Male 101 (34.01%) 86 (28.20%) 187 (31.06%)

Age (missing = 3) 294 (49.08%) 305 (50.92%) 599 (100%) 0.8736
≤ 33 69 (23.47%) 79 (25.90%) 814 (24.72%)
33 -41 74 (25.17%) 78 (25.57%) 152 (25.38%)
42-53 78 (26.53%) 79 (25.90%) 157 (26.21%)
> 53 73 (24.83%) 69 (22.62%) 142(23.71%)

Degree (missing = 4) 294 (49.16%) 304 (50.84%) 598 (100%) 0.2334
BS/MS 124 (42.18%) 105 (34.54%) 229 (38.29%)
PharmD/Residency 166 (56.46%) 198 (65.13%) 336 (61.20%)
PhD 2 (0.68%) 3 (0.99%) 5 (0 .84%)
Other 2 (0.68%) 1 (0.33%) 3 (0.50%)

Practice (missing = 2) 296 (49.33) 304 (50.67%) 600 (100%) <.0001
Independent 103 (34.80%) 59 (19.41%) 162 (27.00%)
Chain 97 (32.77%) 72 (23.68%) 169 (28.176%)
Hospital 57 (19.26%) 99 (32.57%) 156 (26.00%)
Education 0 (0.00%) 8 (2.63%) 8 (1.33%)
Industry/other 26 (8.78%) 74 (24.34%) 82 (18.83%)
Nursing home 13 (4.39%) 10 (3.29%) 23 (3.83%)

Region (missing = 0) 297 (49.34%) 305 (50.66%) 602 (100%) 0.0483
Iowa 215 (72.39%) 198 (64.92%) 413 (68.60%)
North Dakota 82 (27.61%) 107 (35.08%) 189 (31.40%)
*

characteristics sorted by rural (<49,000 population) and urban (>50,000 population)