Table 2.

Coefficients (and corresponding t-values and p-values) for each predictor in a model examining the effect of stimulation condition (anode, sham, and cathode), intensity level (1–2 mA), and trial type (congruent vs. incongruent) on log-transformed RTs from the Eriksen Flanker.

Predictor	Coefficient	T-value	P-value
Condition (C vs. S)	–0.027	–1.35	0.18
Condition (A vs. S)	–0.069	–3.37	0.001
Level (1.5 vs. 1)	0.002	0.16	0.88
Level (2 vs. 1/1.5)	0.008	1.42	0.16
Trial type (con vs. incon)	–0.063	–31.85	<0.0001
Condition (C vs. S) ∗Level (1.5 vs. 1)	0.028	1.14	0.26
Condition (A vs. S)∗Level (1.5 vs. 1)	–0.005	–0.18	0.85
Condition (C vs. S) ∗Level (2 vs. 1/1.5)	0.021	1.44	0.15
Condition (A vs. S) ∗Level (2 vs. 1/1.5)	0.014	0.95	0.35
Condition (C vs. S)∗Trial type	0.001	0.19	0.85
Condition (A vs. S)∗Trial type	0.010	2.10	0.04
Level (C vs. S)∗Trial type	0.003	1.32	0.19
Level (A vs. S) ∗Trial type	0.0002	0.15	0.89
Condition (C vs. S) Level (1.5 vs. 1)∗ Trial type	–0.006	–0.95	0.35
Condition (A vs. S)∗Level (1.5 vs. 1)∗ Trial type	–0.002	–0.37	0.72
Condition (C vs. S) Level (2 vs. 1/1.5)∗ Trial type	0.003	0.79	0.43
Condition (A vs. S) Level (2 vs. 1/1.5)∗ Trial type	–0.00004	–0.01	0.99

Significant values (determined using the Sattherwaite approximation and corresponding to p < 0.05) are bolded.