Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 6;27(1):226–235. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2438-z

Table 1.

Study characteristics and quality assessment

Study Type of surgery Type of study No. of patients in study/control group JADAD/NOS quality score ERAS elements
Ronellenfitsch et al. [8] SG, GB, BPD CS 65/64 6 8
Proczko et al. [9] SG, GB, rev CS 146/228 6 6
Pimenta et al. [10] SG RCT 10/10 3 4
Petrick et al. [11] GB CS 1184/429 5 4
Mannaerts et al. [12] SG, GB, rev CS 1313/654 6 15
Lemanu et al. [13] SG RCT 40/38 3 13
Geubbels et al. [14] GB CS 360/104 6 9
Dogan et al. [15] GB CS 75/75 5 12
Campillo-Soto et al. [16] GB CS 70/49 6 11
Cooney et al. [17] GB CS 12/16 6 9
Barreca et al. [18] SG, GB CS 200/88 5 12

SG sleeve gastrectomy, GB gastric bypass, rev revisionary surgery, BPD biliopancreatic diversion, CS comparative study, RCT randomized control trial