Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep-Oct;18(84):229–239. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.192479

Table 2.

Methodological quality of the studies by the 22 point assessment of the STROBE guide

Article [Reference] Questionnaire items

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Total %
Vangelova and Deyanov[7] 1 1 0.5 1 0.34 1 1 1 1 0 1 0.67 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 NA 17.00 80.95
Chung et al.[11] 1 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 0 1 1 0.92 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 0 NA 17.42 82.94
Mäntysalo and Vuori[12] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0.6 1 1 0.75 1 1 1 1 1 NA 20.35 92.50
Flamme and Williams[14] 1 1 0.5 1 1 0.8 1 1 0 0 1 0.67 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NA 17.47 83.17
Kaerlev et al.[15] 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 18.17 82.58
Kitcher et al.[18] 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.8 1 1 0 0 1 0.34 4 1 1 0.75 1 1 0.5 1 0 NA 15.28 72.78
Jensen et al.[19] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0.34 0.4 1 1 0.75 1 1 1 1 1 NA 17.48 87.42
El Dib et al.[20] 1 1 1 1 0.67 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.67 0.8 1 1 0.75 1 1 1 1 1 NA 19.88 94.68
Dias et al.[21] 1 1 0.5 1 1 0.67 1 1 0 0 1 0.75 0.75 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 NA 15.67 74.60
Dement et al.[22] 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0.67 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19.17 87.12
Shupak et al.[23] 1 1 1 1 0.67 1 0.67 1 0 0 0.67 0.34 0.8 0.6 1 0.75 1 1 0.5 1 0 NA 14.98 71.35
Korres et al.[24] 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0.67 0.8 1 NA 0.88 1 1 0.5 1 1 NA 16.34 81.71
Tomei et al.[25] 1 1 1 1 0.34 1 1 1 1 0 1 0.67 0.4 1 1 0.88 1 1 1 1 1 NA 18.28 87.02
Leme[26] 1 1 0.5 1 0.34 1 1 1 1 0 1 0.34 0.4 1 1 0.75 0 1 0 0.5 0 NA 14.32 68.17
Lee[27] 1 0 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NA 16.80 80.00
Casson et al.[28] 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.67 1 1 0 0 1 0.67 0.4 1 NA 1 1 1 0.5 1 0 1 15.73 74.92
Szczepański and Otto[29] 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.34 1 0 0 1 0.17 0.6 0.8 NA 0.25 0 1 0 0 0 NA 10.65 53.25
Hirai et al.[30] 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 0 1 0.67 0.8 1 NA 0.9 1 1 0.5 0.75 1 NA 18.12 86.27
Tarter and Robins[31] 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.75 1 1 1 0 1 1 0.92 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NA 18.67 88.89
Thiery and Meyer-Bisch[32] 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0.6 1 NA 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 NA 17.60 88.00
Sataloff et al.[33] 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0.8 0.8 NA 0.88 1 1 0 0.75 1 NA 13.98 66.55
Sulkowski et al.[34] 1 1 1 1 1 0.34 1 0.5 0 0 0.67 0 0.4 0.75 NA 0.75 0 1 0 0.75 1 1 13.15 62.62
Gitanjali and Dhamodharan[35] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.75 1 1 1 0.34 1 1 19.58 89.02
Alonso-Díaz[36] 1 1 0.5 1 0.67 0.67 1 1 1 0 0.67 0 0.6 0.75 NA 0.88 1 1 0.5 0.75 1 NA 13.98 69.88
Rios and da Silva[37] 1 1 1 1 0.33 0.8 1 1 1 0 0.67 0.67 0.4 1 1 0.75 1 1 0.5 1 0 NA 15.12 71.98