Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 15;54:143–151. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2016-0043

Table 3.

Results of a discriminant analysis of the variables that were significant in the previous analysis * p < .05; ** p < .01; ***p < .001

MATCHES WITH PENALTIES MATCHES WITHOUT PENALTIES
Structure coefficients Structure coefficients
SC1 SC2 SC1 SC2
log(PATS/PATI) .513
log(PATCO/PATI) .391 .476
log(PG/PLS) .735 .576
log(PEXP/PLSS) .416
log(PLSU/PLIS) .397
log(PLCO/PLI) .483
log(PL1/PL6) .393
log(PL2/PL6) .755 .400
log(PL3/PL6) .534
log(PL4/PL6) .393
log(PL1F/PLD) .334
log(PL2F/PLD) -.333
log(PLM2F/PLD)
Box´s M 174.768 (p = .319) -
Eigenvalue 1.496 .108 2.968 .380
Canonical .774 .312 .865 .525
Correlation Index
Wilk´s Lambda .362 .903 .183 .725
Chi Square 83.402 8.410 47.607 9.013
Df 22 10 26 12
Sig .000*** .589 .006** .702
% Correct % Correct % Correct % Correct
Classification Classification Classification Classification
(Original sample) (Cross-validation) (Original sample) (Cross-validation)
% unfavourable 81.8 68.2 90.9 54.5
% balanced 65.1 53.5 90.5 38.1
% favourable 80.0 76.0 100 40.0
% classification 73.3 63.3 91.9 43.2