Skip to main content
. 2004 Sep 3;101(37):13683–13688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402927101

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

The protective effects of Inline graphic in I/R. (a) The effect of Inline graphic (10 or 100 μM; n = 6 each) compared with saline control (n = 8) on left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) during I/R. The effect of Inline graphic (10 μM) was reversed by the NO scavenger carboxy-PTIO (Inline graphic + C-PTIO, n = 6); carboxy-PTIO alone (C-PTIO, 30 μM; n = 6) had no significant effect compared with saline control. (b) The effect of Inline graphic on infarct size compared with saline control in the absence and presence of carboxy-PTIO. **, P < 0.01 compared with saline control; ##, P < 0.01 compared with carboxy-PTIO + Inline graphic.