Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 16;8(12):819. doi: 10.3390/nu8120819

Table 4.

Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the quality of life per types of household food security.

Food-Secure Household (n = 5413) Food-Insecure Household without Hunger (n = 381) p-Value Food-Insecure Household with Hunger (n = 68) p-Value
Decreased Exercise ability *
Unadjusted 1.00 (ref) 2.78 (1.86–4.14) <0.001 5.93 (3.15–11.2) <0.001
Multivariate adjusted 1 1.00 (ref) 2.22 (1.45–3.40) <0.001 3.22 (1.78–5.82) <0.001
Self-management
Unadjusted 1.00 (ref) 1.68 (0.77–3.66) 0.191 8.23 (2.90–23.4) <0.001
Multivariate adjusted 1 1.00 (ref) 1.15 (0.49–2.70) 0.756 3.19 (0.94–10.8) 0.062
Decreased Daily activity
Unadjusted 1.00 (ref) 1.90 (1.10–3.28) 0.021 9.05 (4.81–17.1) <0.001
Multivariate adjusted 2 1.00 (ref) 1.21 (0.67–2.18) 0.523 3.92 (1.87–8.20) <0.001
Pain/discomfort
Unadjusted 1.00 (ref) 1.54 (1.13–2.08) 0.006 2.55 (1.40–4.65) 0.002
Multivariate adjusted 1 1.00 (ref) 1.29 (0.95–1.76) 0.108 1.69 (0.87–3.27) 0.124
Anxiety/depression
Unadjusted 1.00 (ref) 1.97 (1.36–2.87) <0.001 4.84 (2.74–8.54) <0.001
Multivariate adjusted 1 1.00 (ref) 1.49 (1.00–2.23) 0.049 2.63 (1.52–4.55) 0.001

* Values are presented as odds ratios (95% confidence intervals); differences were tested using unadjusted complex samples logistic regression analysis; 1 differences were tested using multivariate-adjusted complex sample logistic regression analysis after adjusting for sex, age, income, education, alcohol use, smoking status, physical activity, marital status, and recipients of food assistance; 2 differences were tested using multivariate-adjusted complex sample logistic regression analysis after adjusting for sex, age, income, education, alcohol use, smoking status, marital status, and recipients of food assistance.