Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 14;7(28):44236–44251. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10005

Table 1. In silico analysis of the effect of TERF1 and TERF2 expression levels on overall survival and disease free survival (http://www.cbioportal.org).

Cancer type TERF2 TERF1
n Overall survival n Disease free survival n Overall survival n Disease free survival
Breast invasive carcinoma 1092 High expression Sup 1.5 p=0.045 NS NS NS
Colon carcinoma 374 High expression Sup 3 p=0.008 330 High expression Sup 3 p<0.001 NS NS
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma NS 435 High expression Sup 1.1 p=0.044 532 High expression p=0.016 434 High expression p=0.036
Papillary renal cell carcinoma NS 267 High expression Sup 2 p=0.012 288 High expression p<0.001 267 High expression p<0.001
Esophageal carcinoma NS NS 193 High expression, Sup 1.1 p=0.025 NS
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma 517 High expression Sup 1.1 p=0.0474 NS NS NS
Lung adenocarcinoma NS Low expression Inf 1.5 p=0.0097 NS NS
Lung squamous cell carcinoma NS NS Low expression Inf 3 p=0.0065
Prostate adenocarcinoma 496 High expression Sup 1.1 p=0.002 NS NS 490 High expression Sup 3 p=0.01
Uterine carcinoma NS NS NS 162 High expression Sup 2.5 p=0.009
Uveal melanoma NS NS 68 High expression Sup 2 p=0.022 62 High expression Sup 2 p=0.0015

The prognostic value for overall survival and disease free survival of RNA expression levels of TERF2 and its homologue TERF1 were obtained from publicly available databases. Cancers in which overexpression of the genes is detrimental are noted as “High expression” and cancers in which a lower expression is detrimental are noted “low expression” (grey background). Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are presented on a black background. The p-values and threshold values (Sup or Inf) are indicated together with the number of patients (n). NS: non-significant.