. 2016 Dec 9;16(12):2095. doi: 10.3390/s16122095

Table 2.

Imaging quality analysis of comparative experiments.

Point Targets	Algorithms	Azimuth			Range
Point Targets	Algorithms	Resolution (m)	PSLR (dB)	ISLR (dB)	Resolution (m)	PSLR (dB)	ISLR (dB)
$P_{1}$	Traditional algorithm	16.30	−12.82	−10.15	2.71	−12.76	−9.68
$P_{1}$	Proposed algorithm	12.33	−13.25	−10.10	2.66	−13.26	−10.11
$P_{2}$	Traditional algorithm	12.51	−13.26	−10.13	2.66	−13.13	−10.05
$P_{2}$	Proposed algorithm	12.50	−13.25	−10.11	2.66	−13.25	−10.11
$P_{3}$	Traditional algorithm	16.39	−13.65	−11.28	2.68	−13.31	−10.00
$P_{3}$	Proposed algorithm	12.68	−13.26	−10.12	2.66	−13.27	−10.10