Skip to main content
. 2004 Sep 8;32(16):4812–4820. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh818

Table 2. Distribution of bi-directional clusters on each chromosomea.

Chromosome Total number of loci SA loci/total loci (%) NOB loci/total loci (%) Chromosome length (kb) Coverage of SA loci/chromosome length (%) Coverage of NOB loci/chromosome length (%) Coverage of total loci/chromosome length (%)
1 2214 12.9 6.1 246 128 8.4 10.1 42.9
2 1604 14 6.5 243 616 9.6 7.3 40.7
3 1263 15.3 8.1 199 344 12.0 10.1 43.9
4 980 12.6 6.9 191 732 8.5 7.3 36
5 1083 13.1 6.9 181 035 7.6 7.4 35.8
6 1151 12.7 8.2 170 915 9.5 10.1 41
7 1053 12.8 7.2 158 546 8.3 14.5 44
8 865 10.1 7.3 146 309 6.1 11.2 38.3
9 877 15.1 6.4 136 372 8.3 6.1 35.2
10 891 13.6 7.6 135 037 10.6 10.6 44.5
11 1250 13.3 6 134 483 8.9 7.8 40.7
12 1190 13.9 6.3 132 078 12.3 5.3 44.5
13 438 13 7.5 113 043 8.4 7.9 30.3
14 678 15.8 7.2 105 311 6.8 9.3 34.7
15 723 14.8 7.3 100 257 9.3 8.1 38.9
16 900 13.7 6.2 90 042 9.4 6.3 38.7
17 1232 16.4 4.1 81 860 14.9 7.3 50.7
18 388 10.6 8.2 76 115 7.6 10 38.8
19 1336 10.9 3.2 63 812 7.7 2.9 43.4
20 629 11.8 8.4 63 742 7.2 11 40.3
21 286 10.8 9.8 46 976 5.7 9.8 28.2
22 494 15 6.5 49 397 8.8 6.9 36.4
X 782 7.5 4.7 153 692 3.2 5.2 28
Y 34 0 5.9 50 287 0.0 0.6 4.5
Overall 22 341 13.2 6.5 3 070 128 8.6 8.4 38.7

aFor statistical significance, we used ‘Chi-square test’ to determine P-values. SA loci had a significantly (P < 0.05) higher percentage on chromosomes 3 (15.3%), 14 (15.8%) and 17 (16.4%), but a significantly lower percentage on chromosomes 8 (10.1%), 19 (10.9%), X (7.5%) and Y (0%), compared to its overall percentage (13.2%) on the whole genome; whereas, NOB loci had a significantly higher percentage on chromosomes 3 (8.1%), 6 (8.2%) and 21 (9.8%), but a significantly lower percentage on chromosomes 17 (4.1%), 19 (3.2%) and X (4.7%), compared to its overall percentage (6.5%) on the whole genome. On chromosome Y, all bi-directional cluster loci were NOB loci. Although SA loci had a significantly higher percentage (P < 10−4) than NOB loci (13.2 versus 6.5%) in overall loci, their overall coverage of chromosome length are very close (8.6 versus 8.4%), no significant difference.