Table 5.
Contrasts of Indirect Effects
Contrast | β | 95% CI |
---|---|---|
1 vs. 2 | -.069 | [-.288, .034] |
1 vs. 3 | -.140 | [-.417, -.007]* |
1 vs. 4 | -.186 | [-.585, -.005]* |
1 vs. 5 | -.087 | [-.441, .049] |
1 vs. 6 | -.146 | [-.517, .002] |
2 vs. 3 | -.070 | [-.266, .005] |
2 vs. 4 | -.117 | [-.451, .025] |
2 vs. 5 | -.913 | [-1.783, -.281]* |
2 vs. 6 | -.716 | [-1.434, -.159]* |
3 vs. 4 | -.047 | [-.304, .087] |
3 vs. 5 | .052 | [-.076, .307] |
3 vs. 6 | -.006 | [-.206, .120] |
4 vs. 5 | .099 | [-.005, .342] |
4 vs. 6 | .040 | [-.121, .304] |
5 vs. 6 | -.059 | [-.343, .066] |
Note. 1 = Number-Letter Switching; 2 = Letter Fluency; 3 = Category Fluency; 4 = Category Switching; 5 = Inhibition; 6 = Inhibition/Switching.
p < .05.