Table 3. Bivariate correlations between motivation variables and ERPs.
| Variables | PC | ITV | ERN (FCz) | ERN (Cz) | ERN (Pz) | ΔERN (FCz) | ΔERN (Cz) | ΔERN (Pz) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived competence (PC) | .10 | .03 | -.03 | .04 | .02 | -.09 | .01 | |
| Intrinsic task value (ITV) | .10 | -.09 | -.27+ | .02 | -.01 | -.03 | .08 | |
|
| ||||||||
| PC | ITV | Pe (FCz) | Pe (Cz) | Pe (Pz) | ΔPe (FCz) | ΔPe (Cz) | ΔPe (Pz) | |
|
| ||||||||
| Perceived competence (PC) | .10 | .02 | .06 | .43** | -.10 | .04 | .34* | |
| Intrinsic task value (ITV) | .10 | -.22 | -.37** | -.22 | -.04 | -.36** | -.25+ | |
Note. Values represent Spearman rhos.
p<0.01,
p<0.05,
p<0.10.