Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 29;6(4):58. doi: 10.3390/bios6040058

Table 9.

Our real-time WGAS gait classification system vs. the literature.

Reference Algorithms (*) Data Acquisition Overall Accuracy
[22] SVM Three IMUs (Opal, APDM, Inc., Portland, OR, USA) featuring a tri-axial accelerometers and a tri-axial gyroscope 90.5%
[23] ANN, SVM 37 markers were placed on body traced by an infrared camera during walking on the two embedded force plates 96.9%, 98.2%
[24] ANN, SVM 2 markers on the shoe and traced by cameras during walking on a treadmill using the PEAK MOTUS motion analysis system 75%, 83.3%
[25] ANN, SVM Synchronized PEAK 3D motion analysis system and a force platform during normal walking 83.3%, 91.7%
[26] ANN, SVM Gait video sequence captured by a static camera during normal walking 98%, 98%
[27] SVM with PCA Integrated a pressure sensor, a tilt angle sensor, three single-axis gyroscopes, one tri-axial accelerometer and a bend sensor inside a small module in a shoe with an RF transmitter 98%
[28] ANN 29 retro reflective markers placed on the body, with 3D marker trajectories captured with an 8-camera motion analysis system during normal walking 89%
[29] ANN 25 reflective markers placed on the body and data acquired from the Vicon Nexus 3D motion capture system 95%
[30] SVM One tri-axial ACC worn on the subject waist while walking 98%
This work ANN, SVM tri-axial gyroscopes and tri-axial accelerometers integrated on a PCB forming a WGAS with an MSP430 microcontroller and an RF transmitter embedded on the PCB 100%, 98%

* SVM: support vector machine; ANN: artificial neural network; PCA: principle component analysis.