Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 26;2(4):355–365. doi: 10.1002/osp4.58

Table 4.

Unadjusted and Adjusted Odds of Dropping Out of a Weight Loss Program or Losing Insufficient Weight, by Demographic, Clinical, and Psychosocial Factors

Characteristic Dropping Out of Weight Loss Program(n = 200) Losing Insufficient Weight(n = 82)
Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)a Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) Adjusted Odds Ratio(95% Confidence Interval)a
Age (10‐unit increase) 0.52 (0.42, 0.65) 0.56 (0.44, 0.72) 0.74 (0.56, 0.98) 0.95 (0.69, 1.31)
Weight (kg) at 1st Group Session (Week ‐16) 0.99 (0.98, 1.00) 0.99 (0.98, 1.00)
Non‐white vs. White race 1.95 (1.32, 2.88) 1.48 (0.97, 2.26) 2.26 (1.35, 3.81) 1.95 (1.12, 3.39)
Female 1.70 (1.04, 2.78) 1.04 (0.59, 1.81) 2.32 (1.27, 4.23) 1.88 (0.95, 3.69)
< High School Graduate vs High School Graduate 0.83 (0.18, 3.74) 1.36 (0.24, 7.55)
Current tobacco user 2.32 (1.18, 4.57) 2.29 (1.14, 4.60) 1.18 (0.44, 3.19) 1.15 (0.42, 3.16)
Past weight loss attempted 1.29 (0.79, 2.10) 1.09 (0.57, 2.12)
Lack of support person 1.71 (0.97, 3.03) 1.07 (0.47, 2.41)
Favorable expectations about weight loss 1.15 (0.95, 1.40) 1.12 (0.86, 1.45)
Self‐efficacy to initiate diet 0.80 (0.50, 1.28) 1.14 (0.62, 2.08)
Intentions to change diet 0.89 (0.71, 1.11) 0.80 (0.60, 1.07)
Autonomous motivation for eating healthy 0.93 (0.70, 1.25) 0.94 (0.64, 1.39)
Controlled motivation for eating healthy 0.88, (0.78, 1.00) 0.85 (0.72, 1.01)
Self‐efficacy to initiate physical activity 1.11 (0.75, 1.65) 0.66 (0.39, 1.12)
Intentions to engage in physical activity 1.16 (0.98, 1.38) 1.09 (0.87, 1.35)
Autonomous motivation for physical activity 1.16 (0.90, 1.50) 0.85 (0.65, 1.12)
Controlled motivation for physical activity 0.91 (0.81, 1.03) 0.96 (0.84, 1.09) 0.81 (0.69, 0.96) 0.84 (0.71, 0.99)
a

Adjusted model includes only those characteristics statistically significant at the α = 0.05 level of significance in unadjusted analyses.