. 2016 Dec 20;111(12):2551–2561. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.11.014

Table 2.

Preference for, or Against, Bases at Positions Before the mCpG

Position	A	T	C	G
−20	0.008991^a	0.020060	−0.024163	−0.027140
−19	0.015186	0.015147	−0.032146	−0.021962
−18	0.010261^a	0.018965	−0.020827	−0.030077
−17	0.019222	0.016574	−0.029470	−0.032147
−16	0.016058	0.022162	−0.028997	−0.036509
−15	0.016685	0.016373	−0.027418	−0.029210
−14	0.011744	0.016473	−0.023364	−0.24446
−13	0.018341	0.018260	−0.032128	−0.031141
−12	0.010402^a	0.023698	−0.023386	−0.036284
−11	0.018130	0.018050	−0.034394	−0.029115
−10	0.012804	0.019100	−0.021739	−0.035455
−9	0.014612	0.021224	−0.024853	−0.038650
−8	0.014696	0.016282	−0.022333	−0.031099
−7	0.020037	0.019475	−0.030435	−0.038883
−6	0.020191	0.023330	−0.030666	−0.041616
−5	0.022456	0.012800	−0.025835	−0.033383
−4	0.007078^a	0.024616	−0.026189	−0.026724
−3	0.014643	0.033786	−0.021759	−0.006714^a
−2	0.009739^a	0.046507	−0.045858	−0.009157^a
−1	0.029056	−0.034920	−0.002895^a	−0.003161^a

Shown is the deviation from unity in the pulldown efficiency for bases at positions labeled with respect to the mCpG. Values are statistically significant with p value < 0.000125 unless otherwise indicated. Fig. 5 visualizes this data with statistically significant values outlined in black.

Not statistically significant.