Table 3.

Estimates of migration rate between putative populations based on the microsatellite loci data set

[RN] [RN]: 0.90 (0.04)	[RN] [CL]: 0.09 (0.05)	[RN] [MH]: 0.01 (0.01)	[RN] [NC]: 0.05 (0.04)
[CL] [RN]: 0.01 (0.01)	[CL] [CL]: 0.72 (0.07)	[CL] [MH]: 0.01 (0.01)	[CL] [NC]: 0.26 (0.07)
[MH] [RN]: 0.03 (0.02)	[MH] [CL]: 0.04 (0.04)	[MH] [MH]: 0.90 (0.06)	[MH] [NC]: 0.03 (0.03)
[NC] [RN]: 0.02 (0.01)	[NC] [CL]: 0.05 (0.05)	[NC] [MH]: 0.02 (0.02)	[NC] [NC]: 0.91 (0.08)

NC, Necochea; CL, Claromecó; MH, Monte Hermoso; RN, Río Negro.

Mean (standard deviation) posterior distributions for each migration rate among franciscana dolphin locations are shown. Values between the same location represent the proportion of individuals derived from the source population (nonmigrant) each generation.