Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 20;174(2):210–222. doi: 10.1111/bph.13670

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chemical structures and effects on SK1 expression and S1P formation in cells. (A) Chemical structures of FTY720, compound 5, RB‐020 and ROMe. (B) Western blot showing the effect of compound 5 (Cpd5; 10 μM), RB‐020 (10 μM), PF543 (100 nM) and ROMe (10 μM) on the expression levels of SK1 in LNCaP‐AI cells. Actin was used as a loading control. Results are representative of five independent experiments. Also shown is the densitometric quantification represented as a bar graph. *P < 0.05, significantly different from control. (C) Bar graphs showing the effect of compound 5 (30 μM), RB‐020 (10 μM) and PF‐543 (100 nM) on S1P formation from exogenously added sphingosine in HLMVECs. Results are expressed as means ± SD for three independent experiments *P < 0. 05, significantly different from control; one‐way ANOVA with Bonferroni post test. Control values are: basal [32P]S1P = 718 + 169 dpm; plus sphingosine [32P]S1P = 6154 + 569 dpm.