Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 27;6(24):8649–8664. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2550

Table 6.

Redundancy analyses (RDAs) to partition among‐population genetic variation (F) in Pinus strobus and P. monticola into three components: climate (IBE); geography (IBD); and north–south ancestry (IBC)

Combined fractionsa P. strobus P. monticola
All (153) SNPs Bayenv2 outlier (12) SNPsb LFMM outlier (19) SNPsb All (158) SNPs Bayenv2 outlier (12) SNPsb LFMM outlier (6) SNPsb
R 2 p (>F)c R 2 p (>F)c R 2 p (>F)c R 2 p (>F)c R 2 p (>F)c R 2 p (>F)c
F~clim. .059 .001*** .295 .001*** .193 .001*** .089 .001*** .317 .001*** .109 .002**
F~geog. .064 .001*** .327 .001*** .198 .001*** .152 .001*** .400 .001*** .215 .001***
F~anc. .045 .001*** .171 .001*** .139 .001*** .101 .001*** .386 .001*** .088 .001***
Individual fractions a
F~clim. | (geog. + anc.) .001 .382 .016 .091● .025 .010** −.006 .722 −.005 .613 −.048 .962
F~geog. | (clim. + anc.) .007 .023* .034 .002** .026 .001*** .025 .006** .012 .145 .010 .310
F~anc. | (clim. + geog.) .018 .001*** .005 .136 .021 .002** .021 .001*** .059 .001*** −.006 .646
F~clim.+geog. | anc. .029 .125 .051 .049 .072 .124
F~geog.+anc. | clim. −.001 .012 .001 .034 .077 .060
F~clim.+anc. | geog. −.001 −.002 −.003 .002 .011 .012
F~clim. + anc. + geog. .029 .156 .120 .045 .240 .022
Total explainedd .084 .348 .244 .176 .471 .228
Total confoundedd .058 .293 .172 .130 .400 .218
Total unexplained .916 .652 .756 .824 .529 .772
Total 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

aF = Independent matrix of population alleles frequencies; RDA tests are of the form: F~dependent matrices | covariate matrices. Clim. = climate (eight climatic variables); geog. = geography (P. monticola: x, y, xy, y 2; P. strobus: x, y, xy); anc. = north–south ancestry (Q‐values from STRUCTURE). Populations including five or more genotyped individual were used in this analysis.

bSubsets of SNPs detected by Bayenv2 (BF > 3) and by LFMM (< 0.05). The number of SNPs for each subset is given in parentheses.

c< .10; *< .05; **< .01; ***< .001. Significance of confounded fractions between climate, geography, and north–south ancestry was not tested.

dTotal explained = total adjusted R 2 of individual fractions. Total confounded = Total of individual fractions confounded between various combinations of climate, geography, and north–south ancestry. Negative R 2 values were considered null for this calculation.