Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015 Dec 7;42(1):52–60. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3538

Table 5.

Associations between ergonomic factors and endometriosis. [95% CI=95% confidence interval; N=number of flight attendants (including all endometriosis cases); ORadj=adjusted odds ratio].

N ORcrude 95% CI P-value ORadja 95% CI P-value

Lifting ≥15 lbs
(times/day)
0.11 b 0.09 b
  0–5 357 1.0 Ref 1.0 Ref
  6–10 560 1.5 0.9–2.6 1.5 0.8–2.5
  >10 693 0.7 0.4–1.3 0.7 0.4–1.3
Standing
(hours/day)
· b · b
  0–8 555 1.0 Ref 1.0 Ref
  >8 1055 1.4 0.9–2.2 1.4 0.9–2.2
Bending
(times/day)
0.42 b 0.46 b
  0–50 567 1.0 Ref 1.0 Ref
  51–75 365 1.0 0.6–1.7 1.0 0.6–1.7
  >75 678 0.8 0.5–1.3 0.8 0.5–1.4
Pushing and
pulling (times/
day)
0.17 b 0.17 b
  0–19 490 1.0 Ref 1.0 Ref
  20–30 327 0.9 0.5–1.6 0.9 0.5–1.6
  >30 793 0.7 0.4–1.2 0.7 0.4–1.2
Overall
physical effort
0.42 c 0.51 c
  Light,
moderate
575 1.0 Ref 1.0 Ref
  Somewhat
hard
832 1.0 0.6–1.6 0.9 0.6–1.5
  Very hard 203 1.4 0.8–2.7 1.4 0.7–2.6
a

Adjusted for body mass index (continuous variable) and study site.

b

Midpoint of category used to calculate P for linear trend when upper boundary for the category was defined; 1.5 times the lower bound used when there was no upper boundary. P for trend are only presented for variables with ≥3 categories.

c

Ordinal value corresponding to categories used to calculate P-value for linear trend