Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 12;6(4):28. doi: 10.3390/bs6040028

Table 2.

Results of regression analysis: only results with significant gender, or gender by childhood income-to-need ratio effects are presented. EFAT = Emotional Face Assessment Task, ERT: Emotion Regulation Task, SEAT: Shifted-Attention Emotion Appraisal Task, CITN: childhood income-to-need ratio, AITN: current adult income-to-need ratio.

Task/Brain Region Beta Coefficient T-Ratio Significance Level
EFAT Right Amygdala Fearful > Happy
Age −0.43 −1.64 0.11
CITN −0.78 −2.86 0.007
AITN 0.45 0.126 0.9
Gender −5.43 −1.75 0.087
Gender by Age 4.73 1.62 0.11
Gender by AITN −0.28 −0.67 0.51
Gender by CITN 0.80 2.25 0.03
EFAT Right Amygdala Fearful
Age −0.61 −2.39 0.02
CITN −0.65 −2.42 0.02
AITN 0.16 0.05 0.96
Gender −10.80 −3.58 0.001
Gender by Age 10.17 3.60 0.001
Gender by AITN 0.86 2.48 0.017
Gender by CITN −0.14 −0.34 0.74
ERT DLPFC Reappraise > Maintain
Age −0.63 −2.12 0.04
CITN −5.41 −1.20 0.05
AITN 4.16 1.03 0.3
Gender −5.01 −2.24 0.03
Gender by Age 4.98 2.23 0.03
Gender by AITN −4.17 −1.04 0.30
Gender by CITN 5.71 2.18 0.03
ERT VLPFC Reappraise > Maintain
Age −0.53 −1.58 0.12
CITN −5.67 −1.84 0.07
AITN 6.73 1.47 0.15
Gender −5.20 −2.05 0.046
Gender by Age 5.21 2.07 0.05
Gender by AITN −6.82 −1.51 0.14
Gender by CITN 5.78 1.95 0.05