Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 25;7(4):68. doi: 10.3390/insects7040068

Table 3.

Comparative seasonal catches of sterile and wild codling moths in white delta traps baited with various lures in apple orchards under management by sterile insect treatment (SIT) alone or a combination of SIT and pheromone mating-disruption (MD).

Orchard Treatment 1 Lure Type 2 Mean (±SE) Cumulative Number of Moths/Trap 3
Males Female
Sterile Wild Sterile Wild
SIT AA-PE 40.7 ± 13.1 d 1.0 ± 0.5 a 54.3 ± 8.6 a 2.0 ± 0.7 a
CM-DA 699.0 ± 68.6 a 3.7 ± 1.3 a 32.6 ± 7.6 b 1.1 ± 0.4 a
1.0 mg codlemone 470.6 ± 47.0 b 2.0 ± 0.8 a
0.1 mg codlemone 336.3 ± 43.7 c 1.1 ± 0.9 a
SIT + MD AA-PE 9.3 ± 0.9 c 0.4 ± 0.3 c 39.1 ± 5.3 a 3.0 ± 1.0 a
CM-DA 132.6 ± 23.6 a 19.7 ± 9.5 a 22.6 ± 2.5 b 2.0 ± 0.6 a
10.0 mg codlemone 100.1 ± 13.3 a 7.6 ± 2.8 b
1.0 mg codlemone 37.0 ± 7.7 b 2.9 ± 1.5 bc
0.1 mg codlemone 4.9 ± 1.4 c 0.1 ± 0.1 c

1 SIT treatment was one weekly delivery of 4000 mixed-sex (1:1) sterile codling moths ha−1; MD treatment was 1000 Isomate-CM-Flex dispensers ha−1. 2 AA-PE lure was a single 8 mL propylene bottle with a 3 mm diameter hole in its lid containing two small cotton balls and a 5 mL load of an acetic acid plus PE mixture (240:1 µL v:v); CM-DA lure is a grey rubber septum loaded with 3 mg of codlemone plus 3 mg of pear ester (Trécé); codlemone loaded on grey rubber septa. 3 Means (n = 4) within a column and orchard treatment followed by different letters are significantly different (Tukey’s test, α = 0.05) following a significant (p ≤ 0.05) randomised block ANOVA.