Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 1;10(11):YC01–YC05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/23468.8899

[Table/Fig-7]:

Comparison of scores between the two groups.

Study group Control group p- value p-value after adjusting for baseline using ANCOVA Effect size
FMAS1
Mean ± SD 48.1 ± 5.42 45.4 ± 3.42 0.0247 <.0001 0.2870
Median 49 46
Min-Max 30-56 40-51
AOUS1
Mean ± SD 18.07 ± 2.5 16.87 ± 2.52 0.0691 0.0007 0.1830
Median 18 17
Min-Max 13-23 13-21
QOUS1
Mean ± SD 16.8 ± 2.73 15.5 ± 2.11 0.0438 0.0015 0.1640
Median 16.5 15.5
Min-Max 11-22 12-20
FMAS3
Mean ± SD 50.57 ± 4.97 46.93 ± 3.41 0.0017 <.0001 0.4240
Median 52 47.5
Min-Max 33-57 41-52
AOUS3
Mean ± SD 19.7 ± 2.64 18.03 ± 2.77 0.0204 0.0003 0.2030
Median 19 18
Min-Max 15-25 11-23
QOUS3
Mean ± SD 18.2 ± 2.67 16.73 ± 2.46 0.0310 0.0008 0.1790
Median 18.5 17
Min-Max 14-23 12-21

After applying ANCOVA taking baseline as covariate there is significant difference in values of FMAS, AOUS and QOUS between study group and control group at 1 month and 3 months.