Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 1;6:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.09.003

Table 6.

Comparison of participant characteristics, study design, and results between the present study and the Mapstone study [12]

Characteristics Mapstone (discovery) Present study
Participants with normal cognition at baseline 53 221
Participants with amnestic MCI (aMCI) or AD at baseline 35 None
Participants with samples collected at both the baseline (pre) and follow-up (post) 18 (Converters) 221
Partcipants who developed aMCI or AD at the follow-up 18 (Converters) 95
Characteristics Normal (53) aMCI/AD (35) Converters (18) Normal (126) MCI (77) Dementia (18)
Age (years), baseline 81.6 (3.6) 82.3 (4.8) 80.2 (3.0) 70.9 (3.6) 71.3 (3.7) 73.1 (5.0)
% Female 66.0% 71.4% 55.6% 66.7% 62.3% 77.8%
% African American Not reported 96.8% 96.1% 100.0%
Education
 Mean, years 15.68 (2.32) 15.45 (2.19) 15.33 (3.14) Not reported
 % high school graduate Not reported 21.40% 32.50% 33.30%
Follow-up interval, mean, years (range) 2.1 (1–5) 7.3 (5.8–8.6)
Sample for metabolomic analysis Plasma Plasma
Metabolomics method p180 kits (Biocrates) p180 kits (Biocrates)
Performance of the 10-metabolite panel described in the Mapstone study
 Normal versus Converter (pre) AUC 0.96 0.609
 Normal versus aMCI/AD AUC 0.827 0.607

Including nine metabolites instead of 10 because C16:1-OH levels were lower than LOD in all participants in the present study.

For the present study, this reflects normal versus MCI/dementia at the follow-up visit.