Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2016 May 17;311:131–140. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.05.034

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Average reference errors (A), working memory errors (B), perseverative errors (C) and the percentage of spatial (D), serial (E) and mixed/random (F) strategy use during days of retention (Ret) and reversal learning (Rv) testing in the Barnes maze test. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; significant main effect of TAT. #p < 0.053; near significant interaction of TAT × Selegiline.