Table 3.
Students' attitudes towards TRM.
| Level of student |
p-value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 |
200 |
300 |
400 |
Total |
|||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | N (%) | |||
| Rate of effectiveness of TRM | Poor | 18 (6.4) | 22 (30.6) | 4 (1.6) | 7 (10.8) | 51 (7.6) | <0.001 |
| Satisfactory | 48 (17.1) | 7 (9.7) | 47 (18.5) | 24 (36.9) | 126 (18.8) | ||
| Good | 72 (25.7) | 24 (33.3) | 86 (33.9) | 31 (47.7) | 213 (31.7) | ||
| Very good | 142 (50.7) | 19 (26.4) | 117 (46.1) | 3 (4.6) | 281 (41.9) | ||
| Rate of safety of use of TRM | Poor | 36 (12.9) | 18 (25.0) | 20 (7.9) | 15 (23.1) | 89 (13.3) | <0.001 |
| Satisfactory | 46 (16.4) | 15 (20.8) | 109 (42.9) | 34 (52.3) | 204 (30.4) | ||
| Good | 170 (60.7) | 24 (33.3) | 78 (30.7) | 10 (15.4) | 282 (42.0) | ||
| Very good | 28 (10.0) | 15 (20.8) | 47 (18.5) | 6 (9.2) | 96 (14.3) | ||
| Rate of flexibility of TRM | Poor | 27 (9.6) | 18 (25.0) | 16 (6.3) | 7 (10.8) | 68 (10.1) | <0.001 |
| Satisfactory | 60 (21.4) | 23 (31.9) | 110 (43.3) | 19 (29.2) | 21 (31.6) | ||
| Good | 147 (52.5) | 27 (37.5) | 109 (42.9) | 29 (44.6) | 312 (46.5) | ||
| Very good | 46 (16.4) | 4 (5.6) | 19 (7.5) | 10 (15.4) | 79 (11.8) | ||
| Co-use of TRM and OM | Yes | 86 (30.7) | 21 (29.2) | 71 (28.0) | 24 (36.9) | 202 (30.1) | 0.557 |
| No | 194 (69.3) | 51 (70.8) | 183 (72.0) | 41 (63.1) | 469 (69.9) | ||
| Side effects of TRM use | Yes | 20 (7.1) | 4 (5.6) | 46 (18.1) | 14 (21.5) | 84 (12.5) | <0.001 |
| No | 260 (92.9) | 68 (94.4) | 208 (81.9) | 51 (78.5) | 587 (87.5) | ||