Table 2.
Effect of Pongamia pinnata on wound contraction by excision wound model (N = 6).
| Post wounding (days) | Wound area (mm2) (mean ± S.E.) and percentage of wound contraction |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Leaf extract | Standard | |
| 1 | 525 ± 2.1 | 522 ± 3.8 | 515 ± 2.5 |
| 4 | 439 ± 2.2 (16.01%) | 408 ± 2.2 (21.53%) | 415 ± 14.1 (18.94%) |
| 7 | 317 ± 4.2 (35.2%) | 247 ± 2.8 (52.9%) | 270 ± 2.8 (48.29%) |
| 10 | 306 ± 3.9 (41.49%) | 117 ± 5.2 (77.50%) | 189 ± 1.6 (63.08%) |
| 13 | 266 ± 2.7 (49.5%) | 65 ± 1.8 (87.30%) | 108 ± 2.2 (78.90%) |
| 16 | 200 ± 2.4 (61.75%) | 30 ± 2.2b (93.16%) | 73 ± 1.8 (85.96%) |
| 19 | 35 ± 2.2b (93.16%) | 00 ± 2.1 (100%) | 8 ± 0.2 (98.43%) |
| 21 | 00 ± 00b (100%) | 00 ± 00b (100%) | 00 ± 00 (100%) |
p < 0.05. Statistically significant difference in comparison with control group.