Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 4;7(1):79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2015.12.002

Table 2.

Effect of Pongamia pinnata on wound contraction by excision wound model (N = 6).

Post wounding (days) Wound area (mm2) (mean ± S.E.) and percentage of wound contraction
Control Leaf extract Standard
1 525 ± 2.1 522 ± 3.8 515 ± 2.5
4 439 ± 2.2 (16.01%) 408 ± 2.2 (21.53%) 415 ± 14.1 (18.94%)
7 317 ± 4.2 (35.2%) 247 ± 2.8 (52.9%) 270 ± 2.8 (48.29%)
10 306 ± 3.9 (41.49%) 117 ± 5.2 (77.50%) 189 ± 1.6 (63.08%)
13 266 ± 2.7 (49.5%) 65 ± 1.8 (87.30%) 108 ± 2.2 (78.90%)
16 200 ± 2.4 (61.75%) 30 ± 2.2b (93.16%) 73 ± 1.8 (85.96%)
19 35 ± 2.2b (93.16%) 00 ± 2.1 (100%) 8 ± 0.2 (98.43%)
21 00 ± 00b (100%) 00 ± 00b (100%) 00 ± 00 (100%)

p < 0.05. Statistically significant difference in comparison with control group.