Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int Perspect Psychol. 2016 Aug 8;5(4):255–270. doi: 10.1037/ipp0000060

Table 4.

Mean (SD) Scores on Outcome Measures for Children in the Three Intervention Groups

Variable NoI TO T + SC Total Results

Chisholm Indiscriminate Friendliness to Adults (N = 40; 18–47 mos; M = 34.2) 1.43 (.37) 1.37 (.27) 1.00 (.58) 1.20 (.51) T+SC < NoI (p<.037)
Executive Function (CBQ) (31–76 mos.; M = 52.8)
  Inhibitory Control (N = 60) −.45 (1.50) −.51 (1.42) −.34 (1.14) −.41 (1.30) All ns
  Impulsivity (N = 60) .31 (1.17) −.09 (.97) .63 (.95) .39 (1.05) T+SC more Impulsive than NoI (p <.036), more so with more Time in T+SC (p < .052)
  Attentional Focus (N = 63) −.40 (1.59) .19 (1.34) −.04 (1.33) −.11 (1.41) All ns
ITSEA Scale (N = 52; 18–59 mos.; M = 43.2)
 Aggressive/Defiant .54 (1.25) −.66 (.48) .08 (.97) .14 (1.07) More Time in Family, less Aggressive/Defiant (p <.004); T+SC had less Agg/Def than NoI the more Time in BH (p <.083)
 Negative Emotionality .31 (1.20) .03 (.86) .31 (1.15) .28 (1.12) All ns
 Competence −.90 (1.08) −.18 (.66) −.35 (1.07) −.50 (1.05) All ns
CBCL Scale (N=72; 61–129 mos.; M = 86.9)
 Internalizing 50.46 (8.39) 50.16 (10.61) 50.89 (9.78) 50.55(9.44) All ns
 Externalizing 56.64 (6.87) 58.37 (7.86) 58.14 (8.62) 57.68 (7.78) More Time in BH related to more Externalizing (p<.040) in NoI but less Externalizing in T+SC (p< .065) and TO (p<.014)

NoI = No Intervention, TO = Training Only, T+SC = Training & Structural Changes; BH = Baby Home, Fam = Family Type CBQ = Child Behavior Questionnaire, ITSEA = Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment, CBL = Child Behavior Checklist