Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 10;5:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.11.006

Table 3.

Correlations between inter-iFC and ADAS Cog (Mod) scores

Correlation coefficient r (P value)Control subjects: sex, age, GM atrophy
Network Pair lAtt- rAtt- aDMN- pvDMN- pdDMN- Vis- Aud- Sens-
lAtt
rAtt 0.087 (.487)
aDMN 0.039 (.757) 0.029 (.817)
pvDMN −0.038 (.764) 0.008 (.947) 0.109 (.385)
pdDMN −0.112 (.369) −0.166 (.183) 0.149 (.234) −0.236 (.056)
Vis −0.118 (.345) −0.034 (.786) 0.057 (.652) −0.198 (.110) −0.250 (.043)
Aud −0.190 (.127) −0.166 (.182) −0.077 (.538) −0.182 (.144) 0.011 (.931) 0.143 (.251)
Sens −0.045 (.722) −0.170 (.172) −0.077 (.537) −0.074 (.554) 0.067 (.591) 0.043 (.733) −0.046 (.716)

Abbreviations: ADAS Cog, (Mod), modified version of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale; Aud, auditory network; iFC, intrinsic functional connectivity; lAtt, left attention network; pdDMN, posterior-dorsal default mode network; pvDMN, posterior-ventral default mode network; rAtt, right attention network; Sens, sensorimotor network; Vis, visual network.

NOTE. No partial Pearson correlation coefficients (r), controlling for age and sex, were significant following correction for multiple comparisons (corrected a ≤ .006).

Significant/marginally significant correlations at P ≤ .05, before multiple comparison correction.