Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 18;5:23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.12.005

Table 1.

Group description

Measure HAS (n = 74) SCDclinic (n = 33) aMCI (n = 78) F and P values Effect size Pairwise comparisons
Age (y) 69 ± 7.2 68 ± 7.3 73 ± 7.2 F (2, 182) = 7.36 η2 = 0.07 aMCI > HAS∗∗
[63, 68.5, 73] [63, 68, 72] [68, 73, 78] P < .001 aMCI > SCDclinic∗∗
Female: n 40 (54%) 14 (42%) 38 (49%) Fisher's exact test
P = .53
Education (y) 12 ± 3.9 13 ± 3.5 11 ± 3.6 F (2, 179) = 5.65 η2 = 0.06 HAS > aMCI
[9, 12, 15] [10, 14, 15] [7, 10, 14] P = .004 SCDclinic > aMCI∗∗
MMSE (/30) 29 ± 1.2 29 ± 1.1 27 ± 1.7 F (2, 180) = 42.85 η2 = 0.32 HAS > aMCI∗∗∗
[28, 29, 30] [28, 29, 30] [26, 27, 28] P < .001 SCDclinic > aMCI∗∗∗
FCSRT (/48) 30 ± 5.2 31 ± 5.9 17 ± 6.4 F (2, 176) = 117.08 η2 = 0.57 HAS > aMCI∗∗∗
 Sum of 3 free recalls [26, 30, 33] [27, 29, 36] [11, 17, 21] P < .001 SCDclinic > aMCI∗∗∗
FCSRT (/48) 46 ± 2.1 47 ± 1.8 36 ± 7.8 F (2, 176) = 81.70 η2 = 0.48 HAS > aMCI∗∗∗
 Sum of 3 total recalls [45, 47, 48] [45, 47, 48] [30, 37, 43] P < .001 SCDclinic > aMCI∗∗∗
FCSRT (/16) 12 ± 2.3 12 ± 2.2 5 ± 3.6 F (2, 179) = 120.89 η2 = 0.57 HAS > aMCI∗∗∗
 Delayed free recall [10, 12, 14] [10, 12, 13] [2, 6, 8] P < .001 SCDclinic > aMCI∗∗∗
FCSRT (/16) 15.7 ± 0.6 15.7 ± 0.5 12 ± 3.6 F (2, 176) = 61.01 η2 = 0.41 HAS > aMCI∗∗∗
 Delayed total recall [16, 16, 16] [15, 16, 16] [10, 12.5, 15] P < .001 SCDclinic > aMCI∗∗∗
FCSRT (/16) 15.9 ± 0.3 15.9 ± 0.4 14.8 ± 1.6 F (2, 173) = 24.85 η2 = 0.22 HAS > aMCI∗∗∗
 Recognition [16, 16, 16] [16, 16, 16] [14, 15, 16] P < .001 SCDclinic > aMCI∗∗∗
Verbal abilities 0.32 ± 0.89 0.39 ± 0.75 −0.65 ± 0.94 F (2, 155) = 24.72 η2 = 0.28 HAS > aMCI∗∗∗
 Composite score [−0.21, 0.32, 0.80] [−0.24, 0.24, 0.94] [−1.42, −0.49, 0.01] P < .001 SCDclinic > aMCI∗∗∗
Executive function 0.28 ± 0.76 0.47 ± 0.83 −0.59 ± 1.07 F (2, 161) = 22.10 η2 = 0.22 HAS > aMCI∗∗∗
 Composite score [−0.08, 0.35, 0.76] [0.05, 0.39, 0.95] [−1.20, −0.70, 0.04] P < .001 SCDclinic > aMCI∗∗∗
Episodic memory 0.57 ± 0.69 0.37 ± 0.81 −0.90 ± 0.73 F (2, 161) = 77.58 η2 = 0.49 HAS > aMCI∗∗∗
 Composite score [0.13, 0.64, 1.06] [−0.08, 0.31, 0.94] [−1.44, −1.00, −0.46] P < .001 SCDclinic > aMCI∗∗∗
Depression 0.8 ± 1.9 3.4 ± 3.0 3.8 ± 5.4 F (2, 153) = 12.47 η2 = 0.14 SCDclinic > HAS∗∗∗
 MADRS total score [0, 0, 1] [1.5, 2.5, 5] [0, 2, 5] P < .001 aMCI > HAS∗∗∗
SCD 40 ± 17 57 ± 22 60 ± 20 F (2, 182) = 21.08 η2 = 0.19 SCDclinic > HAS∗∗∗
 CDS total score [29, 39.5, 50] [41, 55, 70] [45, 57, 73] P < .001 aMCI > HAS∗∗∗
APOE ε4 carriers: n (%) 17 (24%) 4 (15%) 25 (50%) Fisher's exact test HAS > aMCI∗∗
P = .002 SCDclinic > aMCI∗∗

Abbreviations: aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment; CDS, Cognitive Difficulties Scale; FCSRT, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test; HAS, healthy aged subjects; MADRS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; MMSE, Mini Mental State Examination; SCD, subjective cognitive decline.

NOTE. For numerical variables, we indicated the mean ± standard deviation [first quartile, median, and third quartile]. Fisher's LSD test was used as a post hoc test: P < .05, ∗∗P < .01, ∗∗∗P < .001. For the sake of readability, patients values are given in bold when different from the HAS group (P < .05). Group comparisons were also assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests because some variables (recognition, depression) had strongly skewed distributions; results were unchanged. Percentages of APOE ε4 carriers are calculated based on the number of available genotypes within each group (n = 72 for HAS, n = 26 for SCDclinic, n = 50 for aMCI).

Scores that were used in the inclusion battery.