Table 3.
Common sources for misdiagnosis of CQR and CQS Plasmodium vivax
| Explanation | Recommendation | |
|---|---|---|
| Incorrect diagnosis of CQS | ||
| Enrollment of patients without clinical disease | Host immunity in asymptomatic patients enrolled from cross-sectional surveys, may facilitate clearance of parasitaemia even following partially effective drug treatment | Restrict efficacy trials to patients presenting with clinical disease |
| Coadministration of early PQ | Early PQ has schizontocidal activity that can increase parasite clearance and prevent recrudescent infections | Primaquine treatment should be delayed until the end of the follow-up period |
| Short duration of follow-up | Early evidence of resistance is manifest by late recrudescence | Patients should be followed up for a minimum of 28 days |
| Incorrect diagnosis of CQR | ||
| Incomplete treatment course | From poor patient adherence | Supervision of drug treatment |
| Dose of chloroquine administered too low | Prescription of inadequate mg/kg dose | Documentation of exact dose of drug administered |
| Poor absorption of drug | Either from poor quality drug, reduced gastrointestinal absorption | Measurement of drug blood concentrations on day 7 and the day of parasite recurrence |
| Poor drug quality | Faulty product | Confirmation of adequate drug levels, pharmacologic evaluation of study drugs, and purchase only from certified, trusted producers |
| Inadequate sample size | Leading to wide confidence intervals of high failure rates derived from very few cases | Recruitment of an adequate sample (> 70 patients) |
CQR = chloroquine resistant; CQS = chloroquine sensitive; PQ = primaquine.