Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 28;95(6 Suppl):35–51. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0171

Table 3.

Common sources for misdiagnosis of CQR and CQS Plasmodium vivax

Explanation Recommendation
Incorrect diagnosis of CQS
 Enrollment of patients without clinical disease Host immunity in asymptomatic patients enrolled from cross-sectional surveys, may facilitate clearance of parasitaemia even following partially effective drug treatment Restrict efficacy trials to patients presenting with clinical disease
 Coadministration of early PQ Early PQ has schizontocidal activity that can increase parasite clearance and prevent recrudescent infections Primaquine treatment should be delayed until the end of the follow-up period
 Short duration of follow-up Early evidence of resistance is manifest by late recrudescence Patients should be followed up for a minimum of 28 days
Incorrect diagnosis of CQR
 Incomplete treatment course From poor patient adherence Supervision of drug treatment
 Dose of chloroquine administered too low Prescription of inadequate mg/kg dose Documentation of exact dose of drug administered
 Poor absorption of drug Either from poor quality drug, reduced gastrointestinal absorption Measurement of drug blood concentrations on day 7 and the day of parasite recurrence
 Poor drug quality Faulty product Confirmation of adequate drug levels, pharmacologic evaluation of study drugs, and purchase only from certified, trusted producers
 Inadequate sample size Leading to wide confidence intervals of high failure rates derived from very few cases Recruitment of an adequate sample (> 70 patients)

CQR = chloroquine resistant; CQS = chloroquine sensitive; PQ = primaquine.