Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 13;595(1):321–339. doi: 10.1113/JP272215

Figure 3. Opposite changes induced by sevoflurane and propofol on visual response.

Figure 3

A, single VEP traces and ensemble averages from an individual animal exposed to brief light pulses (pulse duration 20 ms; pulse irradiance 25 μW cm−2; pulse rate 0.1 Hz) at incremental concentrations of sevoflurane (2.5, 3.75 and 5%; left) and propofol (1, 1.5 and 2 mg kg−1 min−1; right). B and C, bars graphs of VEP amplitude (B; RMS amplitude, first 150 ms from stimulus onset, estimated from the averaged waveform) and the onset of the P1 deflection (C; mean latency of the 50% of P1 amplitude). These estimates were obtained from the same animals, each exposed to all dosages of both anaesthetics in two separate experimental sessions, run a few days apart (n = 6 rats). Notice how, sevoflurane increased the VEP amplitude in a concentration‐dependent fashion, while propofol did the opposite. Also notice that the VEP latency was incremented by both drugs, indicating a common reduction in neuronal excitability. Asterisks indicate significance values (B and C, principal effect by one‐way rANOVA; P > 0.05, ns; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001).