Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 20;13:349–360. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.12.021

Table 3.

Brain regions with significant between-group differences in nodal efficiency and nodal degree respectively.

Metric Regions Category HC Non-NPSLE p value (uncorrected) T value (p value) of clinical correlations with SLEDAI
Nodal efficiency
IFGoperc.R Frontal 0.471 ± 0.029 (× e-02) 0.447 ± 0.032(× e-02) 0.0052 ↓ ——
IFGtriang.R Frontal 0.477 ± 0.031(× e-02) 0.456 ± 0.031(× e-02) 0.0069 ↓ − 0.409 (0.034)
DCG.L Paralimbic 0.569 ± 0.045(× e-02) 0.537 ± 0.039(× e-02) 0.0070 ↓ − 0.391 (0.044)

Nodal
degree
ORBsup.L Frontal 0.105 ± 0.011 0.113 ± 0.007 0.0061 ↑ ——
IFGoperc.R Frontal 0.093 ± 0.009 0.087 ± 0.009 0.0038 ↓ ——
DCG.L Paralimbic 0.125 ± 0.019 0.111 ± 0.009 0.0026 ↓ − 0.428 (0.026)
DCG.R Paralimbic 0.131 ± 0.013 0.123 ± 0.012 0.0041 ↓ ——
IOG.L Occipital 0.069 ± 0.007 0.075 ± 0.007 0.0072 ↑ − 0.594 (0.001)
FFG.R Occipital 0.115 ± 0.016 0.107 ± 0.008 0.0066 ↓ − 0.409 (0.034)
PCUN.R Parietal 0.153 ± 0.018 0.143 ± 0.013 0.0055 ↓ ——

The values of the nodal efficiency and nodal degree were measured as the AUC values across the sparsity range. The between-group comparisons of the regional properties were performed by using nonparametric permutation test (p < 0.01, uncorrected). The age effect was removed in these comparisons. ——, indicating that the nodal property has no significant correlations with the SLEDAI scores.