Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 20;13:349–360. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.12.021

Table 4.

The NBS results: the connected sub-networks that show decreased (left half) and increased (right half) connections in non-NPSLE patients compared with the HCs (p < 0.01, NBS corrected).

HC > non-NPSLE
HC < non-NPSLE
Connection
HC
(× e-04)
Non-NPSLE
(× e-04)
T-stat Connection
HC
(× e-04)
Non-NPSLE
(× e-04)
T-stat
Region A Region B Region A Region B
DCG.L IFGtriang.L 10.75 ± 11.33 2.671 ± 3.312 3.63 PCUN.L PHG.L 2.912 ± 2.965 11.53 ± 10.47 4.20
DCG.L ANG.R 2.291 ± 2.853 0.296 ± 0.566 3.68 PCUN.L THA.R 6.429 ± 5.741 12.26 ± 6.963 3.59
DCG.L PCUN.L 908.8 ± 170.8 775.5 ± 106.2 3.53 PCUN.L STG.L 9.910 ± 7.802 27.73 ± 18.24 4.96
DCG.L PAL.L 0.439 ± 0.555 0.056 ± 0.065 3.63 TPOmid.R CAL.R 0.196 ± 0.365 1.039 ± 1.148 3.75
DCG.L MTG.R 0.972 ± 1.137 0.195 ± 0.229 3.50 TPOmid.R LING.R 0.102 ± 0.365 1.076 ± 1.410 3.54
ITG.R LING.R 2.320 ± 3.625 8.152 ± 7.905 3.53