Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr 16;215(2):206.e1–206.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.008

TABLE 1.

Descriptive statistics of study population

Variables Mesh complications (n = 27) Prolapse
(n = 30)
P value
Mesh
exposure
(n = 15)
Pain
(n = 12)
Mean age, y±SD 56.1 ± 8.0 52.1 ± 9.7 52.9 ±9.2 .527
Mean body mass index,
kg/m2± SD
30.8 ± 5.9 27.3 ± 3.3 28.5 ± 4.0 .158
Median gravidity, n (25 %ile,
75 %ile)
3.0 (2.0, 4.0) 3.5 (2.0, 5.75) 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) .644
Median parity, n (25 %ile,
75 %ile)
2.0 (2.0, 3.0) 3.0 (2.0, 5.0) 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) .899
Mean time implanted, mo ± SD 36.9 ± 30.3 30.9 ± 18.0 NA .527
Menopausal status, n (%)
    Premenopausal 2 (13) 3 (25) 12 (40)
    Postmenopausal 13 (87) 9 (75) 18 (60) .190
Smoking, n (%)
    Nonsmoker 12 (80) 9 (75) 27 (90)
    Smoker 3 (20) 3 (25) 3 (10) .713
Race/ethnicity, n (%)
    White 15 (100) 12 (100) 29 (97)
    Indian 0 0 1 (3)
    Other 0 0 0 1.000
Hormonal usage, n (%)
    Yes 7 (47) 7 (58) 7 (23)
    No 8 (53) 5 (42) 23 (77) .077

NA not applicable.

Nolfi et al. Vaginal macrophage profile in women with mesh complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016.