Table 3. Selected optimization for ring expansion of cyclobutenone 3a.
![]() | ||||||
Entry | Ligand | Precatalyst | T (°C) | Solvent | Time | Yield a |
1 | dppp | [Rh(COD)Cl]2 | 130 | Dioxane | 24 h | 0% |
2 | dppb | [Rh(COD)Cl]2 | 130 | Dioxane | 24 h | 0% |
3 | PPh3 b | [Rh(COD)Cl]2 | 150 | Dioxane | 24 h | 0% |
4 | dppb | [Rh(COD)Cl]2 | 150 | Dioxane | 24 h | 0% |
5 | dppp | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 150 | Dioxane | 24 h | 70% c |
6 | dppp | [Rh(COD)OMe]2 | 150 | Dioxane | 24 h | 56% c |
7 | dppp | [lr(COD)OMe]2 | 150 | Dioxane | 24 h | 0% |
8 | dppe | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 150 | Dioxane | 24 h | 50% |
9 | dppb | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 150 | Dioxane | 24 h | 86% c |
10 | dpppent | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 150 | Dioxane | 24 h | 76% |
11 | dppb | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 130 | Dioxane | 24 h | 81% c |
12 | None | None | 130 | Dioxane | 24 h | 0% |
13 | None | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 130 | Dioxane | 24 h | 37% (67%) |
14 | dppp | None | 130 | Dioxane | 24 h | 0% |
15 | None | none d | 130 | Dioxane | 24 h | 0% |
18 | dppb | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 110 | Dioxane | 48 h | 92% |
19 | dppb | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 100 | Dioxane | 48 h | 74% (80%) |
20 | dppb | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 90 | Dioxane | 48 h | 65% (82%) |
21 | dppb | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 80 | Dioxane | 48 h | 42% (77%) |
22 | dppb | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 110 | THF | 48 h | 80% (93%) |
23 | dppb | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 110 | Toluene | 48 h | 90% |
24 | dppb | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 110 | CH3CN | 48 h | 58% (73%) |
25 | dppb | [Rh(COD)OH]2 | 110 | nBu2O | 48 h | 30% (79%) |
26 | dppb | [Rh(COD)OH] 2 | 110 | PhEt | 48 h | 95% c |
aUnless otherwise noted, all yields were determined by 1H NMR using 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane as the internal standard. Values in the parentheses are yields based on recovered starting material.
b30 mol% of PPh3 was used as the ligand.
cIsolated yields.
d20 mol% of NaOH was used.