Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 22;19(12):pyw064. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyw064

Table 1.

Results of Single Marker Associations for Bipolar II Disorder

SNP CHR: Position Mapped Gene Minor/Major Allele Chip / Impute Discovery Samples Replication Samples Meta-Analysis P Value
MAF (case/control) P Value OR MAF (case/control) P Value OR
rs3789559 1:6105109 KCNAB2 T/C Chip 0.425/0.314 2.1×10–6 1.76 0.320/0.318 0.92 1.01 5.5×10–6
rs3789560 1:6104715 KCNAB2 G/A Impute 0.427/0.317 2.4×10–6 1.77 0.322/0.322 0.98 1.00 6.2×10–6
rs3789556 1:6108863 KCNAB2 G/A Impute 0.415/0.300 2.5×10–6 1.78 0.306/0.308 0.97 0.99 6.5×10–6
rs77034375 4:88815986 Nearby HSP90AB3P T/C Impute 0.124/0.062 1.9×10–6 2.53 0.096/0.057 7.0×10–3 1.76 6.8×10 –7
rs3828554 4:88813875 Nearby HSP90AB3P C/T Impute 0.121/0.060 2.9×10–6 2.53 0.096/0.055 4.0×10–3 1.84 6.6×10 –7
rs62318301 4:88811182 Nearby HSP90AB3P G/A Impute 0.119/0.059 4.9×10–6 2.49 0.093/0.055 6.0×10–3 1.79 1.5×10 –6
rs114640425 4:37761675 G/C Impute 0.143/0.075 3.2×10–6 2.49 0.103/0.066 1.7×10–2 1.60 2.2×10 –6
rs6991165 8:57435745 LOC100507632
(LINC00968)
A/G Chip 0.481/0.353 4.8×10–6 1.70 0.373/0.374 0.96 0.99 1.2×10–5
rs10887909 10:90857775 A/G Impute 0.438/0.326 2.9×10–6 1.73 0.384/0.320 1.5×10–2 1.32 1.8×10 –6
rs9583266 13:109250314 MYO16 A/G Impute 0.195/0.105 1.7×10–6 2.06 0.140/0.109 8.0×10–2 1.35 3.0×10 –6
rs2182501 13:109255438 MYO16 C/T Impute 0.196/0.108 3.3×10–6 2.01 0.143/0.109 6.0×10–2 1.38 5.0×10 –6
rs66581286 13:109259587 MYO16 A/G Impute 0.193/0.106 3.6×10–6 2.01 0.137/0.106 0.09 1.34 6.7×10–6
rs11619281 13:109225931 G/A Impute 0.231/0.138 3.6×10–6 2.27 0.179/0.150 0.14 1.25 7.9×10–6
rs34497953 13:109226359 C/T Impute 0.231/0.138 3.6×10–6 2.27 0.179/0.150 0.14 1.25 7.9×10–6
rs35218525 13:109179086 G/A Impute 0.243/0.148 4.0×10–6 1.89 0.187/0.161 0.19 1.22 9.5×10–6
rs11616644 13:109169847 C/T Impute 0.232/0.139 4.0×10–6 1.90 0.187/0.155 0.11 1.27 8.0×10–6
rs11616603 13:109171415 G/A Impute 0.236/0.142 4.0×10–6 1.89 0.188/0.158 0.13 1.25 8.5×10–6
rs11616630 13:109171673 C/A Impute 0.236/0.143 4.1×10–6 1.89 0.188/0.158 0.13 1.25 8.7×10–6
rs4771589 13:109182384 T/G Impute 0.243/0.149 4.2×10–6 1.89 0.187/0.161 0.19 1.22 9.9×10–6
rs71439369 13:109196377 T/C Impute 0.237/0.143 4.6×10–6 1.88 0.183/0.160 0.25 1.19 1.1×10–5
rs1924345 13:109189032 C/T Impute 0.243/0.149 4.6×10–6 1.88 0.191/0.162 0.14 1.24 1.0×10–5
rs1924348 13:109191801 G/A Impute 0.236/0.143 4.8×10–6 1.88 0.188/0.159 0.14 1.25 1.0×10–5
rs2147148 13:109190538 G/A Impute 0.236/0.143 4.8×10–6 1.88 0.188/0.159 0.14 1.25 1.0×10–5
rs61212586 14:86123937 Nearby FLRT2 A/G Impute 0.275/0.163 4.6×10–6 1.94 0.150/0.153 0.84 0.97 1.2×10–5
rs16941261 15: 88655520 NTRK3 C/G Impute 0.129/0.069 3.9×10–6 2.57 0.068/0.070 0.87 0.96 1.0×10–5

Abbreviations: CHR, chromosome; MAF, minor allele frequency; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

Association analyses using logistic regression with an additive model while adjusted for gender and age.

P values in meta-analysis were calculated based on the inverse gamma method and we reported SNPs (highlighted in gray) with combined P value <5×10–6.