Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 9;8(11):3417–3432. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw236

Table 1.

Putative Targets of Balancing Selection

Test 1
Test 2—ZFD
Test 2—FFD
Gene Species MK1 + TD MK2 + TD TajD0 FuF0 FuD0 π/dxy0 TajD4 FuF4 FuD4 π/dxy4
AQP9 Lm 0.28 NA 0.05 0.02* 0.11 <1E-4* 0.31 0.69 0.8 0.11
BCL3 Lm 0.03* 0.76 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.32 0.69 0.82 0.82 0.87
CYLD Lm 0.02* 0.06 0.75 0.79 0.75 0.02* 0.46 0.8 0.85 0.94
ELK1 Lm NA NA 0.66 0.47 0.42 0.3 0.62 0.15 0.02* 0.02*
EPS8 Lm 0.25 0.03* 0.39 0.38 0.42 0.02* 0.90 0.84 0.73 0.57
IL17RD Lm 0.02* 0.21 0.63 0.68 0.68 0.02* 0.50 0.09 0.02* 0.63
IL28RA Lm NA NA 0.22 0.03* 0.02* 0.22 0.20 0.05* 0.05* 0.03*
NBN Lm 0.1 0.03* 0.56 0.52 0.49 0.48 0.51 0.52 0.52 0.88
NFE2L2 Lm 0.17 0.01* 0.83 0.97 0.98 0.18 0.43 0.4 0.43 0.7
PAFAH1B1 Lm 4E-3* 0.04* 0.84 0.87 0.83 <1E-4* 0.14 0.21 0.38 0.24
PRDX6 Lm 0.04* 4E-4* 0.67 0.68 0.63 0.08 0.40 0.29 0.3 0.46
PRELID1 Lm 0.23 0.45 0.93 0.39 0.04* 0.01* 0.95 0.83 0.7 0.45
RNF41 Lm 5E-3* 0.22 0.52 0.8 0.82 NA 0.31 0.38 0.44 0.27
SEC61A1 Lm 0.01* 1 0.43 0.11 0.04* <1E-4* 0.27 0.06 0.04* 0.01*
SIGLEC1 Lm 0.01* 0.51 0.88 0.76 0.63 0.02* 0.67 0.7 0.68 0.31
SOCS3 Lm 0.12 0.03* 0.64 0.68 0.68 0.65 0.26 0.18 0.21 0.96
SOD1 Lm 0.01* 0.11 0.71 0.72 0.66 0.71 0.81 0.65 0.5 0.96
TAX1BP1 Lm 0.82 0.35 0.10 0.03* 0.06 0.04* 0.23 0.24 0.35 0.07
UBA52 Lm 0.02* 1 0.33 0.06 0.01* <1E-4* 0.26 0.02* 1E-3* 0.33
USP7 Lm 1E-3* 1 0.62 0.55 0.50* 0.01* 0.68 0.41 0.28 0.78
AAMP Lvg 0.04* NA 0.44 0.58 0.59 <1E-4* 0.73 0.38 0.21 0.7
AKIRIN2 Lvg 0.6 NA 0.05* 0.03* 0.14 <1E-4* 0.28 0.22 0.23 0.09
APP Lvg 0.02* 1 0.75 0.7 0.63 NA 0.54 0.69 0.71 0.66
CANX Lvg 0.35 0.05* 0.38 0.5 0.56 0.04* 0.25 0.11 0.1 0.22
CD40LG Lvg 0.09 0.04* 0.65 0.66 0.64 0.11 0.71 0.37 0.25 0.86
CEBPG Lvg 0.04* 0.56 0.94 0.97 0.96 NA 0.70 0.85 0.85 0.3
GP5 Lvg 0.02* 0.12 0.33 0.16 0.15 0.11 0.31 0.2 0.2 0.74
HSF1 Lvg 0.03* 0.07 0.70 0.62 0.54 0.07 0.85 0.54 0.31 0.86
ITFG1 Lvg 0.01* NA 0.62 0.65 0.63 <1E-4* 0.52 0.52 0.51 0.72
KLHL6 Lvg 0.03* 0.3 0.85 0.66 0.51 NA 0.23 0.08 0.09 0.02*
OTUD5 Lvg 0.05* 0.01* 0.46 0.48 0.46 0.36 0.22 0.39 0.5 0.83
PAMR1 Lvg 0.02* 0.45 0.80 0.96 0.96 0.06 0.65 0.51 0.43 0.78
PRDX6 Lvg 0.22 0.02* 0.29 0.58 0.67 0.07 0.35 0.27 0.29 0.22
SEC61A1 Lvg 1E-3* 0.51 0.76 0.28 0.11 <1E-4* 0.73 0.42 0.25 0.1
SIGLEC1 Lvg 4E-3* 0.13 0.93 0.96 0.95 0.05* 0.68 0.55 0.46 0.62
SQSTM1 Lvg 0.57 0.02* 0.16 0.23 0.32 0.31 0.62 0.68 0.65 0.83
TAP1 Lvg 0.02* 0.2 0.79 0.85 0.82 0.01* 0.44 0.14 0.08 0.03*
TRIM32 Lvg 0.01* 0.03* 0.89 0.96 0.95 0.01* 0.68 0.71 0.67 0.3
UBA52 Lvg 4E-4* <1E-4* 0.74 0.96 0.96 <1E-4* 0.94 0.95 0.87 0.93
USP7 Lvg 1E-4* 1 0.76 0.79 0.74 <1E-4* 0.78 0.68 0.56 0.95

Note.—List of genes identified with composite tests 1 or 2 as targets of balancing selection in L. montandoni (Lm) and L. v. graecus (Lvg). Test 1 identified genes showing an excess of nonsynonymous polymorphisms segregating at intermediate frequencies: a combination of significant McDonald–Kreitman test conducted on ungenotyped (MK1) or genotyped (MK2) data and not significant or significantly positive Tajima’s D (TD). Test 2 identified genes with high ratio of polymorphism to divergence showing an excess of polymorphisms segregating at high frequencies: a combination of increased polymorphism-to-divergence ratio (π/dxy) and significantly positive Tajima’s D (TajD) or Fu and Li’s F (FuF) or Fu and Li’s D (FuD). Test 2 was performed for 0-fold degenerate (ZFD, 0) and 4-fold degenerate (FFD, 4) sites.

P values in bold indicate test combinations determining inclusion of a particular gene as candidate. Symbols of genes which were confirmed as single-copy are in bold.

NA, not applicable.