Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 9;8(11):3516–3528. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw251

Table 1.

Goodness of Fit of the 10 Different Models of Chromosome Number Evolution Applied to Both Polymorphic and Single Coding Schemes

Coding scheme Polymorphic data
Single data
AICa wi AIC wi
Modelsb Mc0 4365.36 (10) 0.00 4521,52 (10) 0.00
Mc1 3212.72 (7) 0.00 3344.48 (7) 0.00
Mc2 3010.22 (1) 0.70 3175.18 (1) 0.67
Mc3 3012.02 (2) 0.28 3176.98 (2) 0.27
Ml0 3886.44 (9) 0.00 3925.98 (9) 0.00
Ml1 3180.42 (6) 0.00 3294.32 (5) 0.00
Ml2 3018.10 (3) 0.01 3180.84 (3) 0.04
Ml3 3019.84 (4) 0.01 3183.28 (4) 0.01
Mb1 3488.58 (8) 0.00 3496.40 (8) 0.00
Mb2 3169.84 (5) 0.00 3300.90 (6) 0.00

Note.—wi = AIC relative weights.

aIn bold, the lowest AIC value for each data set indicates the best model.

bIn brackets, the numbers indicate the descending order of the best model