Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Horm Behav. 2016 Nov 19;87:145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.11.011

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Numbers of USV calls are shown. Note that the y-axis varies across graphs. A) The total number of USVs was significantly higher in Veh than E2 treated animals on Trials 2 and 3. B) For FM calls both Veh and E2 rats called significantly more on Trial 3 compared to all other trials, and had more FM calls on Trial 2 than on Trial 1. However, there were no significant E2 effects on FM USVs. C) Non-frequency modulated (NFM) calls were higher in Veh than E2 rats on Trial 3. Data are shown as mean ± SEM.